Coping with hallucinated voices in schizophrenia: A review of self-initiated strategies and therapeutic interventions
Abstract
This article reviews the state of knowledge about strategies used by people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia to cope with hallucinated voices, and considers the role of coping in psychological treatments for persisting symptoms. The use of self-initiated ('natural') coping strategies appears almost universal amongst voice-hearers. These strategies are similar across cultures, and include diverse behaviours, only a minority of which is specific to hallucinations. Most strategies are reported by at least some users to be effective, but more sophisticated outcome studies are lacking. Some evidence for the efficacy of certain behavioural techniques of coping, for the manipulation of auditory input, and for strategies involving subvocalisation, is available from experimental studies. Therapeutic enhancement of natural coping strategies for persisting symptoms has demonstrated some efficacy, but its benefit for voices is unknown. Despite this, it has become an established part of some CBT interventions for psychosis. Further advances in knowledge and practice may come from utilisation of coping models in research, longitudinal and ideographic methods of study and a movement away from descriptive coping lists to investigations of coping styles, mechanisms of action, and the process of coping.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individuals who are more distressed by auditory verbal hallucinations tend to use more avoidant or resistance coping strategies.
“In comparison, individuals who are more distressed by AVHs tend to use more avoidant or resistance coping strategies (Farhall et al., 2007;Singh et al., 2003;Vaughan & Fowler, 2004).”
From Mindfulness for voices: An experimental analogue study of the effect of manipulating response style to simulated voices in a non‐clinical population. (2023) · cites this paper as Farhall et al., 2007
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 142 · Cited by 118
- Authors
- Farhall, J., Greenwood, K. M., & Jackson, H. J.
- Affiliations
- La Trobe University (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 476-493
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994049129
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 142
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 3.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, auditory verbal hallucinations, voice hearers, coping strategies, cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis, cross-cultural comparison
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Attention, Behavior Therapy, Hallucinations, Humans, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Speech Perception, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review