Psychotherapeutic interventions for depressed, low-income women: A review of the literature
Abstract
Low-income women have very high rates of depression and also face a number of unique barriers that can prevent them from seeking, accepting, engaging in, or benefiting from psychotherapy treatment. Untreated depression often leads to deleterious psychological consequences for these women and their children, and may also diminish a woman's ability to improve her economic circumstances. We reviewed the literature on psychotherapeutic interventions for depressed, low-income women, identifying a number of practical, psychological, and cultural barriers that often prevent them from engaging in psychotherapy. Next, we assessed the degree to which established intervention programs help women overcome these barriers. The data suggest that it is quite difficult to engage depressed, low-income women in psychotherapy, but that a number of standard psychotherapy approaches do show promise. However, we found that many of the currently available interventions fail to fully address the barriers that prevent this population from engaging in treatment. Moreover, the impact these interventions have on engagement and attrition rates or clinical improvements is often inadequately reported. We provide preliminary recommendations for clinicians who work with low-income women as well as suggestions for bolstering the literature base.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Barriers to use of mental health services include infrequent screening, particularly in clinics caring for predominantly Black and Latina women, as well as healthcare mistrust.
“Barriers to use of services include infrequent screening, particularly in clinics caring for predominantly Black and Latina women, as well as healthcare mistrust [5].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 121
- Authors
- Levy, L. B., & O'Hara, M. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Levy, Lauren B.
- ORCID
- Levy, Lauren B.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 934-950
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078351048
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Keywords
- depression, low-income women, psychotherapeutic interventions, barriers to psychotherapy, treatment engagement, treatment discontinuation, economic hardship, maternal depression, cultural barriers, women's mental health
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Poverty, Pregnancy, Psychotherapy, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review