Cited by 103Digital Mental Health InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Technological adjuncts to enhance current psychotherapy practices: a review

Clough, Bonnie A., Casey, Leanne M.·2011·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Although there are several of reviews of technology in psychology, none to date has focused on technological adjuncts for improving traditional face to face therapy. However, examination of response, adherence, and dropout rates suggests there is considerable scope for improving traditional face to face services. The purpose of this paper was to examine technological adjuncts used to enhance psychotherapy practice. This review focused only on those technologies designed to supplement or enhance traditional therapy methods. Adjuncts designed to reduce direct therapist contact or change the medium of communication were not included. Adjuncts reviewed were mobile phones, personal digital assistants, biofeedback and virtual reality. Limitations in the current literature and directions for future research were identified and discussed. This review provides a comprehensive examination of the way in which adjunctive technologies may be incorporated into face to face therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biofeedback provides a valuable tool in psychotherapy.

    “While biofeedback is an established method to strengthen weakened physiological processes (e.g., hand strength weakness; Garcia- Hernandez et al., 2018), it can also be used to affect psychological states, such as emotions (e.g., anxiety; Vitasari et al., 2011) or attention (Fehmi and Shor, 2013) and thus provides a valuable tool in psychotherapy (Clough and Casey, 2011;Lehrer, 2018).”

    From Physiological feelings (2019) · cites this paper as Clough and Casey, 2011

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 114 · Cited by 103

Authors
Clough, B. A., & Casey, L. M.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Clough, Bonnie A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
279-292
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984450478
Cited by
103
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
psychotherapy practice, face-to-face therapy, mobile devices, personal digital assistants, biofeedback, virtual reality, medication adherence, treatment discontinuation, treatment response
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychotherapy, Technology, User-Computer Interface, Telemedicine, Computers, Handheld, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review