Cited by 87Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Is the transtheoretical model and motivational interviewing approach applicable to the treatment of eating disorders? A review

Dray, Jayne, Wade, Tracey D.·2012·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Research in eating disorders is reviewed examining the (1) utility of the Transtheoretical Model in predicting outcome, and (2) efficacy of Motivational Interviewing (MI). There were promising results showing significant relationships between initial stage of change and treatment outcome related to eating pathology (not including purging), body mass index, and some aspects of psychopathology. Of those treatment studies utilising a control group, there was little indication that using MI conferred significant treatment benefit, with the exception of improving motivation and binge eating for people with binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa. Overall the content of the studies varied greatly with relation to: stage of change and outcome measures, format of MI, diagnostic groupings, age of participants, utilisation of other adjunctive treatments, sample size, presence of follow-up assessments, and study design. Few of the 9 studies examining the efficacy of MI could be considered to have robust methodology. It is recommended that future research using the Transtheoretical Model to predict outcome adopt more uniform methodology so that we can more specifically determine its applicability, and that well-designed treatment studies in eating disorder populations be conducted so that we develop a stronger evidence base from which to decide whether MI confers benefit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 87

Authors
Dray, J., & Wade, T. D.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wade, Tracey D.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
558-565
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077330388
Cited by
87
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
eating disorders, transtheoretical model, motivational interviewing, stages of change, treatment outcome prediction, binge eating disorder, bulimia nervosa, motivation, body mass index, psychopathology, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Models, Psychological, Psychotherapy, Research Design, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review