The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analysis of psychological treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder in adult survivors of childhood abuse
Open accessAbstract
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is highly prevalent in adult survivors of childhood sexual and/or physical abuse. However, intervention studies focusing on this group of patients are underrepresented in earlier meta-analyses on the efficacy of PTSD treatments. The current meta-analysis exclusively focused on studies evaluating the efficacy of psychological interventions for PTSD in adult survivors of childhood abuse. Sixteen randomized controlled trials meeting inclusion criteria could be identified that were subdivided into trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), non-trauma-focused CBT, eye movement desensitization and reprocessing, and other treatments (interpersonal, emotion-focused). Results showed that psychological interventions are efficacious for PTSD in adult survivors of childhood abuse, with an aggregated uncontrolled effect size of g=1.24 (pre- vs. post-treatment), and aggregated controlled effect sizes of g=0.72 (post-treatment, comparison to waitlist control conditions) and g=0.50 (post-treatment, comparison with TAU/placebo control conditions), respectively. Effect sizes remained stable at follow-up. As the heterogeneity between studies was large, we examined the influence of two a priori specified moderator variables on treatment efficacy. Results showed that trauma-focused treatments were more efficacious than non-trauma-focused interventions, and that treatments including individual sessions yielded larger effect sizes than pure group treatments. As a whole, the findings are in line with earlier meta-analyses showing that the best effects can be achieved with individual trauma-focused treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Research has indicated the effectiveness of interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder in individuals who have experienced childhood sexual abuse77,78”
From Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review (2019) · cites this paper as [77]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As previously shown, individual trauma-focused treatments are efficacious for adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse with PTSD, albeit analyses have so far failed to unpack which elements of trauma-focused interventions are most effective [146].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey
Kessler, R. C. (1995) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240066012 · Cited by 10,379
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Sterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., Carpenter, J., Rucker, G., Harbord, R. M., Schmid, C. H., et al. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002 · Cited by 7,709
A Multidimensional Meta-Analysis of Psychotherapy for PTSD
Bradley, R., Greene, J., Russ, E., Dutra, L., & Westen, D. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.214 · Cited by 1,938
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing: Basic Principles, Protocols, and Procedures
Shapiro, F. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,529
Cloitre, M., Stolbach, B. C., Herman, J. L., Kolk, B. V. D., Pynoos, R., Wang, J., & Petkova, E. (2009) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.20444 · Cited by 1,473
Cloître, M., Koenen, K. C., Cohen, L. R., & Han, H. (2002) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.70.5.1067 · Cited by 1,099
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Long-term outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: an umbrella review
Hailes, H. P., Yu, R., Danese, A., & Fazel, S. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30286-x · Cited by 827
Leichsenring, F., Steinert, C., Rabung, S., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2022) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20941 · Cited by 485
Roberts, N. P., Roberts, P. A., Jones, N., & Bisson, J. I. (2015) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.02.007 · Cited by 429
Coventry, P. A., Meader, N., Melton, H., Temple, M., Dale, H., Wright, K., Cloitre, M., Karatzias, T., Bisson, J., Roberts, N. P., et al. (2020) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262 · Cited by 358
Psychological interventions for ICD-11 complex PTSD symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis
Karatzias, T., Murphy, P., Cloitre, M., Bisson, J., Roberts, N., Shevlin, M., Hyland, P., Maercker, A., Ben-Ezra, M., Coventry, P., et al. (2019) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291719000436 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Ehring, T., Welboren, R., Morina, N., Wicherts, J. M., Freitag, J., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Münster (DE)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Tilburg University (NL)
- King Abdulaziz University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Ehring, Thomas
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 645-657
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973427828
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 74
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, childhood abuse, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, psychological intervention, trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy, EMDR, interpersonal psychotherapy, emotion-focused therapy, treatment efficacy, treatment moderators
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Psychotherapy, Group, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse, Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
