Cited by 154Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Deficits in social cognition in first episode psychosis: A review of the literature

Open access
Healey, Kristin M., Bartholomeusz, Cali F., Penn, David L.·2016·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Objective Individuals with chronic schizophrenia (SCZ) consistently show impairments in social cognition (SC) that are associated with functional decline, and work suggests that similar associations exist in first-episode psychosis (FEP). The goal of the current article is to review and synthesize the current body of work examining SC in FEP. Secondary aims are to examine the relationship between SC and symptoms, and change in SC over time in FEP.Design Literature is reviewed from four key SC domains: emotion processing (EP), theory of mind (ToM), social perception (SP), and attributional style (AS). Targeted searches of PsycINFO and Google Scholar were conducted to identify relevant manuscripts.Results Data from 48 relevant studies (6 longitudinal) were reviewed and integrated.Conclusions (1) FEP individuals show consistent deficits in SC compared to healthy controls, most consistently in EP (particularly, fear and sadness recognition) and ToM compared to SP and AS, (2) individuals with FEP and SCZ show comparable SC deficits, (3) some evidence indicates SC deficits in FEP are associated with negative and positive symptoms, and (4) SC appears to be stable over time in FEP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.10.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 154

Authors
Healey, K. M., Bartholomeusz, C. F., & Penn, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Healey, Kristin M.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
50
Pages
108-137
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2530794160
Cited by
154
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
first-episode psychosis, social cognition, emotional processing, theory of mind, social perception, attributional style, schizophrenia, negative symptoms, positive symptoms, functional decline
MeSH terms
Emotions, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review