Deficits in social cognition in first episode psychosis: A review of the literature
Open accessAbstract
Objective Individuals with chronic schizophrenia (SCZ) consistently show impairments in social cognition (SC) that are associated with functional decline, and work suggests that similar associations exist in first-episode psychosis (FEP). The goal of the current article is to review and synthesize the current body of work examining SC in FEP. Secondary aims are to examine the relationship between SC and symptoms, and change in SC over time in FEP.Design Literature is reviewed from four key SC domains: emotion processing (EP), theory of mind (ToM), social perception (SP), and attributional style (AS). Targeted searches of PsycINFO and Google Scholar were conducted to identify relevant manuscripts.Results Data from 48 relevant studies (6 longitudinal) were reviewed and integrated.Conclusions (1) FEP individuals show consistent deficits in SC compared to healthy controls, most consistently in EP (particularly, fear and sadness recognition) and ToM compared to SP and AS, (2) individuals with FEP and SCZ show comparable SC deficits, (3) some evidence indicates SC deficits in FEP are associated with negative and positive symptoms, and (4) SC appears to be stable over time in FEP.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social cognition domains such as mental state attributions, emotion recognition, and attributional biases are affected in first episode psychosis.
“It addresses domains of social cognition that are affected in the FEP [23], such as mental state attributions, emotion recognition, and attributional biases”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 154
- Authors
- Healey, K. M., Bartholomeusz, C. F., & Penn, D. L.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Healey, Kristin M.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 108-137
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2530794160
- Cited by
- 154
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- first-episode psychosis, social cognition, emotional processing, theory of mind, social perception, attributional style, schizophrenia, negative symptoms, positive symptoms, functional decline
- MeSH terms
- Emotions, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Theory of Mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review