Does exercise improve sleep for adults with insomnia? A systematic review with quality appraisal
Open accessAbstract
Insomnia is recognised as the most prevalent sleep disorder. Untreated insomnia carries a heavy burden for patients and society. Exercise is proposed as a safe, inexpensive, and accessible non-pharmacological treatment. To the author's knowledge this is the first systematic review to investigate the sleep-enhancing effects of exercise by focusing exclusively on controlled trials comprising poor sleepers only and examining interventions consistent with national guidelines. Using a narrative synthesis, this review aimed to identify whether exercise improves objective and subjective sleep outcomes for people with insomnia. Five papers including participants with insomnia disorder, and six papers including participants with insomnia symptoms were identified through electronic database searches (CINAHL plus, PsycINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CENTRAL) and quality assessed using the Clinical Trial Assessment Measure. We found that exercise interventions led to improvements in subjective sleep quality for people with insomnia disorder and insomnia symptoms. However, exercise only improved objective and subjective measures of sleep continuity (sleep onset latency and sleep efficiency) for people presenting with insomnia symptoms, with a reduction in sleep onset latency being the most consistently observed effect across studies. The reliability of significant findings is reduced by methodological limitations. Recommendations are made to improve the quality of future research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 86 · Cited by 121
- Authors
- Lowe, H., Haddock, G., Mulligan, L. D., Gregg, L., Fuzellier-Hart, A., Carter, L.-A., & Kyle, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kyle, Simon D.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901962576
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (DRF-2012-05-163)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- physical activity, insomnia, sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, non-pharmacological treatment, insomnia symptoms, sleep continuity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review