Cited by 121Sleep and related disordersPhysical Activity and HealthSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Does exercise improve sleep for adults with insomnia? A systematic review with quality appraisal

Open access
Lowe, Hayley, Haddock, Gillian, Mulligan, Lee D., Gregg, Lynsey, Fuzellier-Hart, Annabel, Carter, Lesley-Anne, Kyle, Simon D.·2019·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Insomnia is recognised as the most prevalent sleep disorder. Untreated insomnia carries a heavy burden for patients and society. Exercise is proposed as a safe, inexpensive, and accessible non-pharmacological treatment. To the author's knowledge this is the first systematic review to investigate the sleep-enhancing effects of exercise by focusing exclusively on controlled trials comprising poor sleepers only and examining interventions consistent with national guidelines. Using a narrative synthesis, this review aimed to identify whether exercise improves objective and subjective sleep outcomes for people with insomnia. Five papers including participants with insomnia disorder, and six papers including participants with insomnia symptoms were identified through electronic database searches (CINAHL plus, PsycINFO, EMBASE, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CENTRAL) and quality assessed using the Clinical Trial Assessment Measure. We found that exercise interventions led to improvements in subjective sleep quality for people with insomnia disorder and insomnia symptoms. However, exercise only improved objective and subjective measures of sleep continuity (sleep onset latency and sleep efficiency) for people presenting with insomnia symptoms, with a reduction in sleep onset latency being the most consistently observed effect across studies. The reliability of significant findings is reduced by methodological limitations. Recommendations are made to improve the quality of future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.11.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 86 · Cited by 121

Authors
Lowe, H., Haddock, G., Mulligan, L. D., Gregg, L., Fuzellier-Hart, A., Carter, L.-A., & Kyle, S. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Kyle, Simon D.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
68
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901962576
Cited by
121
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 3
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (DRF-2012-05-163)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
physical activity, insomnia, sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep efficiency, non-pharmacological treatment, insomnia symptoms, sleep continuity
MeSH terms
Adult, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review