Cited by 203Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPersonality Traits and PsychologyPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

A meta-analytic review of personality traits and their associations with mental health treatment outcomes

Bucher, Meredith A., Suzuki, Takakuni, Samuel, Douglas B.·2019·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Personality traits have been hypothesized to be clinically useful for diagnosis, client conceptualization, treatment planning, as well as for predicting treatment outcomes. Although several studies examined the relation between personality traits and specific therapy outcomes, this literature has not yet been systematically reviewed. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to investigate the relations between personality traits and various therapeutic outcomes. Traits were organized via the domains of the five-factor model to provide a common framework for interpreting effects. Across 99 studies (N = 107, 206), overall findings indicated that traits were systematically related to outcomes, with many specific relations congruent with theorized predictions. Generally, lower levels of neuroticism and higher levels of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and openness were associated with more favorable outcomes. More specifically, agreeableness had positive associations with therapeutic alliance and conscientiousness was positively related to abstinence from substances suggesting these traits are likely a beneficial factor to consider at the outset of services. Personality traits also related to various outcomes differently based on moderators. For example, duration of treatment moderated links between traits and outcomes suggesting these effects are amplified over longer services. Overall results suggest that personality assessment can aid with case conceptualizati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2019.04.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analyses and systematic reviews have described initial symptom severity, personality characteristics, heredity, childhood stressful events, neurophysiological markers, and genetic determinants as possible predictors of psychotherapy outcome in anxiety and depressive disorders.

    “В метаанализах и систематических обзорах в качестве возможных предикторов исхода психотерапии тревожных и депрессивных расстройств описаны изначальная тяжесть клинических симптомов [7-9], личностные характеристики пациентов [10], насле дственность [8], стрессовые события в детстве [9], нейрофизиологические маркеры [9, 11], генетические детерминанты [9].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 110 · Cited by 203

Authors
Bucher, M. A., Suzuki, T., & Samuel, D. B.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Bucher, Meredith A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
70
Pages
51-63
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2925851520
Cited by
203
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Purdue University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
personality traits, Big Five personality traits, treatment outcome prediction, therapeutic relationship, substance abstinence, neuroticism, extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, openness to experience, treatment duration, personality assessment, case formulation, psychotherapy outcome
MeSH terms
Therapeutic Alliance, Mental Disorders, Humans, Personality, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review