Using Facebook to support learning and exam preparation in a final-year undergraduate pharmacy clinical therapeutics module
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent research shows that, for some health care professionals, the risk of using social media is still a concern for the exposure of one's private life.
“Recent research shows that, for some HCPs, the risk of using SM is still a concern for the exposure of one’s private life [10,39,148].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [148]
The Results and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) report privacy concerns among final-year pharmacy students, including worries that social media reaches into their personal lives and exposes private information to a teacher. The study does not establish that practicing health care professionals share this concern, so the claim extends the finding to a different population. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBoth students and faculty are worried that connecting via social media would blur the boundaries of the teacher-student relationship, also recognized in other studies.
“Both students and faculty are worried that connecting via SM would blur the boundaries of the teacher-student relationship, also recognized in other studies [148,149].”
From Dangers and Benefits of Social Media on E-Professionalism of Health Care Professionals: Scoping Review (2021) · cites this paper as [148]
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that some learners were concerned about privacy when a teacher moderated a Facebook page using their personal profiles, and it raises questions about power relations and access to private information. This supports the student-boundary concern, but the paper does not report that faculty were worried about blurring the teacher–student relationship; it says no professionalism issues occurred. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 38 · Cited by 14
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Salmon GK. E-moderation: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. 2nd ed, London, New York: Routledge Falmer; 2004.
- Authors
- Mawdsley, A., & Schafheutle, E. I.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Mawdsley, Andrew
- Venue
- Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 869-875
- ISSN
- 1877-1297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1896760730
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- Facebook, social media in education, exam preparation, pharmacy education, clinical therapeutics, multiple-choice questions, peer support, student engagement, assessment and feedback, student perceptions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
