Exploratory implementation of a blended format escape room in a large enrollment pharmacy management class
Abstract
Background and purpose Adapting the popular entertainment activity "Escape Rooms" for educational purposes is an innovative teaching method with the potential to improve the learning experience. This implementation of an educational escape room explored the feasibility of using a blended online/offline escape room activity in a large enrollment pharmacy management course. Educational activity and setting An educational escape room activity based on a mixture of online and paper-based clues was designed and implemented in the human resources module of a third professional year pharmacy management course with 141 students. The proof of concept was assessed via an instructor post-activity feasibility analysis and a log of estimated time for all design, development, and delivery components. The instructional objectives of creating a fun, engaging, and collaborative method of teaching were evaluated through an anonymous online student survey. Findings The blended environment escape room was implemented successfully. Student perceptions of the activity were generally very positive. In comparison with a typical classroom experience, 91% (n = 126) of participants indicated they were more engaged in thinking about the problems and 89% (n = 123) enjoyed the escape room more. Summary With an instructional design that addresses logistical requirements, educational escape rooms can be conducted in courses with large enrollments. Time requirements for this type of teaching method are subst…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Facilitating a physical EEA with large cohorts of students is difficult to achieve.
“First, facilitating a physical EEA with large cohorts of students is difficult to achieve. 55,56”
From Fostering Motivation toward Chemistry through Augmented Reality Educational Escape Activities. A Self-Determination Theory Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [55]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Elford, D., Lancaster, S. J., & Jones, G. A. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00428 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cain, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Kentucky (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cain, Jeff
- ORCID
- Cain, Jeff
- Venue
- Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 44-50
- ISSN
- 1877-1297 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2895110117
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 11
- FWCI
- 33.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2021-02-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
- Keywords
- educational escape rooms, blended learning, large class instruction, student engagement, active learning, student perceptions, instructional design, feasibility assessment
- MeSH terms
- Games, Recreational, Education, Pharmacy, Educational Measurement, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Problem-Based Learning, Medication Therapy Management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review