Radiomic mapping model for prediction of Ki-67 expression in adrenocortical carcinoma
Abstract
Aim To determine the value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT)-derived radiomic features in the preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression in adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) and to detect significant associations between radiomic features and Ki-67 expression in ACC.Materials and methods For this retrospective analysis, patients with histopathologically proven ACC were reviewed. Radiomic features were extracted for all patients from the preoperative contrast-enhanced abdominal CT images. Statistical analysis identified the radiomic features predicting the Ki-67 index in ACC and analysed the correlation with the Ki-67 index.Results Fifty-three cases of ACC that met eligibility criteria were identified and analysed. Of the radiomic features analysed, 10 showed statistically significant differences between the high and low Ki-67 expression subgroups. Multivariate linear regression analysis yielded a predictive model showing a significant association between radiomic signature and Ki-67 expression status in ACC (R 2=0.67, adjusted R 2=0.462, p=0.002). Further analysis of the independent predictors showed statistically significant correlation between Ki-67 expression and shape flatness, elongation, and grey-level long run emphasis (p=0.002, 0.01, and 0.04, respectively). The area under the curve for identification of high Ki-67 expression status was 0.78 for shape flatness and 0.7 for shape elongation.Conclusion Radiomic features derived from preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images show encouraging results in the prediction of the Ki-67 index in patients with ACC. Morphological features, such as shape flatness and elongation, were superior to other radiomic features in the detection of high Ki-67 expression.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The adrenocortical carcinoma CT dataset's segmentation target (adrenal tumor) was neither part of the training nor of the existing validation sets.
“we used the recent adrenocortical carcinoma CT dataset34,42,43, where the segmentation target, adrenal tumor, was neither part of the training nor of the existing validation sets.”
From Segment anything in medical images (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Ahmed, A. A., Elmohr, M. M., Fuentes, D., Habra, M. A., Fisher, S. B., Perrier, N. D., Zhang, M., & Elsayes, K. M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Elsayes, K.M.
- Venue
- Clinical Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 479.e17-479.e22
- ISSN
- 0009-9260 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3008134192
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- adrenocortical carcinoma, Ki-67 expression, radiomics, contrast-enhanced CT, preoperative prediction, tumor proliferation marker, radiomics signature
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Contrast Media, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Biomarkers, Tumor, Adrenocortical Carcinoma, Ki-67 Antigen, Preoperative Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review