The current status and future of FDA-approved artificial intelligence tools in chest radiology in the United States
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more widespread within radiology. Capabilities that AI algorithms currently provide include detection, segmentation, classification, and quantification of pathological findings. Artificial intelligence software have created challenges for the traditional United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process for medical devices given their abilities to evolve over time with incremental data input. Currently, there are 190 FDA-approved radiology AI-based software devices, 42 of which pertain specifically to thoracic radiology. The majority of these algorithms are approved for the detection and/or analysis of pulmonary nodules, for monitoring placement of endotracheal tubes and indwelling catheters, for detection of emergent findings, and for assessment of pulmonary parenchyma; however, as technology evolves, there are many other potential applications that can be explored. For example, evaluation of non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis interstitial lung diseases, synthesis of imaging, clinical and/or laboratory data to yield comprehensive diagnoses, and survival or prognosis prediction of certain pathologies. With increasing physician and developer engagement, transparency and frequent communication between developers and regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, AI medical devices will be able to provide a critical supplement to patient management and ultimately enhance physicians' ability to improve patient care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent work has provided insights into subsets of devices, but a comprehensive characterization of FDA-authorized AI-enabled devices is currently lacking.
“Recent work has provided insights into subsets of devices6–11, but a comprehensive characterization of FDA-authorized AI-enabled devices is currently lacking.”
From How AI is used in FDA-authorized medical devices: a taxonomy across 1,016 authorizations (2025) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
The false hope of current approaches to explainable artificial intelligence in health care
Ghassemi, M., Oakden-Rayner, L., & Beam, A. L. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(21)00208-9 · Cited by 1,724 · see citing works
Cutillo, C. M., Sharma, K. R., Foschini, L., Kundu, S., Mackintosh, M., Mandl, K. D., MI in Healthcare Workshop Working Group, Beck, T., Collier, E., Colvis, C., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0254-2 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaboration between clinicians and vision–language models in radiology report generation
Tanno, R., Barrett, D. G. T., Sellergren, A., Ghaisas, S., Dathathri, S., See, A., Welbl, J., Lau, C., Tu, T., Azizi, S., et al. (2025) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03302-1 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
How AI is used in FDA-authorized medical devices: a taxonomy across 1,016 authorizations
Singh, R., Bapna, M., Diab, A. R., Ruiz, E. S., & Lotter, W. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01800-1 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Beyond single systems: how multi-agent ai is reshaping ethics in radiology
Salehi, S., Singh, Y., Habibi, P., & Erickson, B. J. (2025) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering12101100 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Milam, M. E., & Koo, C. W.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Corresponding author
- Koo, C.W.
- ORCID
- Koo, C.W.
- Venue
- Clinical Radiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-02
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 115-122
- ISSN
- 0009-9260 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4297537833
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, FDA regulation, thoracic radiology, chest radiography, lung nodule detection, endotracheal intubation, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, AI medical devices, regulatory approval
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Radiology, Radiography, Thoracic, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review