Cited by 75Gut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis researchMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Deciphering the gut microbiome: The revolution of artificial intelligence in microbiota analysis and intervention

Open access
Abavisani, Mohammad, Khoshrou, Alireza, Foroushan, Sobhan Karbas, Ebadpour, Negar, Sahebkar, Amirhossein·2024·Current Research in Biotechnology

Abstract

The human gut microbiome is an intricate ecosystem with profound implications for host metabolism, immune function, and neuroendocrine activity. Over the years, studies have strived to decode this microbial universe, especially its interactions with human health and underlying metabolic processes. Traditional analyses often struggle with the complex interplay within the microbiome due to presumptions of microbial independence. In response, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) provide advanced multivariate and non-linear analytical tools that adeptly capture the complex interactions within the microbiota. With the influx of data from metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), there's an increasing reliance on these artificial intelligence (AI) subsets to derive actionable insights. This review delves deep into the cutting-edge ML techniques tailored for human gut microbiota research. It further underscores the potential of gut microbiota in shaping clinical diagnostics, prognosis, and intervention strategies, pointing to a future where computational methods bridge the gap between microbiome knowledge and targeted health interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.crbiot.2024.100211

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI enables researchers to navigate the complexity of multi-omics data, uncovering how microbial composition, metabolic signatures, and host immune responses influence ICB outcomes.

    “AI enables researchers to navigate the complexity of multi-omics data, uncovering how microbial composition, metabolic signatures, and host immune responses influence ICB outcomes (Abavisani et al., 2024; Li et al., 2022).”

    From Microbiota-centered interventions to boost immune checkpoint blockade therapies (2025) · cites this paper as Abavisani et al., 2024

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 155 · Cited by 75

Authors
Abavisani, M., Khoshrou, A., Foroushan, S. K., Ebadpour, N., & Sahebkar, A.
Affiliations
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Sahebkar, Amirhossein
Venue
Current Research in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024
Volume
7
Pages
100211
ISSN
2590-2628 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394858522
Cited by
75
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 8
FWCI
10.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Research in Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
gut microbiota, artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, metagenomic next-generation sequencing, host-microbe interactions, microbiome-based diagnostics, host metabolism, immune function, neuroendocrine activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review