CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 83Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityAntimicrobial agents and applicationsContact Dermatitis and Allergies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a natural ingredient–natural preservative: a case study

Open access
Kerdudo, Audrey, Burger, Pauline, Merck, Florence, Dingas, Alexandre, Rolland, Yohan, Michel, Thomas, Fernandez, Xavier·2016·Comptes Rendus Chimie
DOI 10.1016/j.crci.2016.06.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Lately, the cosmetic and personal care market has been more and more driven toward natural ingredients by the rising consumers' awareness about personal health and safety and their will for safer cosmetics free of harmful chemicals. Preservatives are no exception to the rule: evidence or suspicion of the toxicity of certain synthetic preservatives that have been around for decades pushed the cosmetic industry forward to seek for natural alternatives, as the selection of natural preservatives already available is quite limited. Sourcing active metabolites and developing new natural ingredients are long-term procedures that are thoroughly described in the present paper, via the example of the design of a natural preservative based on the Santolina chamaecyparissus extract, and of the assessments of its preservative effectiveness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.crci.2016.06.004

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. [5] Kabara, J.J.; Orth, D.S. (Kabara, J.J.; Orth, D.S., eds.), Preservative-Free and Self-Preserving Cosmetics and Drugs: Principles and Practices, Vol. 16, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA, 1997 · DOI
  2. [6] Elsner, P.; Merk, H.F.; Maibach, H.I. Cosmetic – Controlled Efficacy Studies and Regulations, Springer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, 1999 · DOI
  3. [10] d'Enfert, V. Expr. Cosmétique, 24 (2013), p. 40
  4. [16] Ozcan, B.; Esen, M.; Sangun, M.K.; Coleri, A.; Caliskan, M. J. Environ. Biol., 31 (2010) no. 5, p. 637
  5. [27] Formulating, Packaging, and Marketing of Natural Cosmetic Products (Dayan, N.; Kromidas, L., eds.), John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA, 2011
  6. [29] Cosmeceuticals and Active Cosmetics (Sivamani, R.K.; Jagdeo, J.R.; Elsner, P.; Maibach, H.I., eds.), CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, USA, 2015
  7. [30] Ibarra, F.; Straetmans, Dr; Johnson, C.H. Cosmet. Toilet., 123 (2008), p. 81
  8. [31] Kunlayakorn, L.; Kanlayavattanakul, M.; Lourith, N. J. Health Res., 23 (2009) no. 1, p. 1
  9. [32] Preservatives for Cosmetics (Steinberg, D.C., ed.), Allured Publishing Corporation, Wheaton, USA, 2012
  10. [33] Siegert, W. Microbiology, 8 (2013) no. 2, p. 32
  11. [35] European Pharmacopoeia, seventh ed., Chapter 5.1.3. Efficacy of Antimicrobial Preservation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 83

Related

Metadata

Authors
Kerdudo, A., Burger, P., Merck, F., Dingas, A., Rolland, Y., Michel, T., & Fernandez, X.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Naturex (France) (FR)
ORCID
Venue
Comptes Rendus Chimie
Publisher
MathDoc/Centre Mersenne
Published
2016-07-25
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
1077-1089
ISSN
  • 1631-0748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-1543
DOI
10.1016/j.crci.2016.06.004
OpenAlex
W2500259659
Cited by
83
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Comptes Rendus Chimie (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Comptes Rendus Chimie (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Provence-Alpes Côtes d'Azur region and European Union (2009_26268/2010_07953)
  • French National Association for Research and Technology (748/2010)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antimicrobial agents and applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Keywords
natural preservatives, Santolina chamaecyparissus, plant extracts, cosmetic preservatives, natural ingredients, preservative effectiveness, bioactive metabolites, personal care products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review