The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug–drug interactions in oncology: Why are they important and can they be minimized?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Slamon, D. J., Leyland-Jones, B., Shak, S., Fuchs, H., Paton, V., Bajamonde, A., Fleming, T., Eiermann, W., Wolter, J., Pegram, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200103153441101 · Cited by 11,500
Effects of St. John's wort on irinotecan metabolism.
Mathijssen, R. H. J. (2002) · CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment · doi:10.1093/jnci/94.16.1247 · Cited by 457
Anantharaju, A., Feller, A., & Chedid, A. (2002) · Gerontology · doi:10.1159/000065506 · Cited by 201
Cited by
Drug interactions in cancer therapy
Scripture, C. D., & Figg, W. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1887 · Cited by 366
EORTC elderly task force position paper: Approach to the older cancer patient
Pallis, A. G., Fortpied, C., Wedding, U., Van Nes, M. C., Penninckx, B., Ring, A., Lacombe, D., Monfardini, S., Scalliet, P., & Wildiers, H. (2010) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.022 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Blower, P., de Wit, R., Goodin, S., & Aapro, M.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 117-142
- ISSN
- 1040-8428 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1989264162
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 3.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug–drug interactions in oncology: Why are they important and can they be minimized? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.03.007
- The paper
- Blower, P., de Wit, R., Goodin, S., & Aapro, M. (2005). Drug–drug interactions in oncology: Why are they important and can they be minimized? Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.03.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
