Cited by 4

Long-duration energy storage in transmission-constrained variable renewable energy systems

Chu, Andrew K., Baik, Ejeong, Benson, Sally M.·2025·Cell Reports Sustainability

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.crsus.2024.100285

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. [1]1. Albertus, P. ∙ Manser, J.S. ∙ Litzelman, S. Long-duration electricity storage applications, economics, and technologies Joule. 2020; 4:21-32 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (261) Google Scholar
  2. [3]3. Zhang, J. ∙ Guerra, O.J. ∙ Eichman, J. ... Benefit analysis of long-duration energy storage in power systems with high renewable energy shares Front. Energy Res. 2020; 8, 527910 Crossref Scopus (27) PubMed Google Scholar
  3. [4]4. Guerra, O.J. ∙ Zhang, J. ∙ Eichman, J. ... The value of seasonal energy storage technologies for the integration of wind and solar power Energy Environ. Sci. 2020; 13:1909-1922 Crossref Google Scholar
  4. [5]5. Heuberger, C.F. ∙ Mac Dowell, N. Real-world challenges with a rapid transition to 100% renewable power systems Joule. 2018; 2:367-370 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (82) Google Scholar
  5. [6]6. Liu, T. ∙ Yang, Z. ∙ Duan, Y. Short- and long-duration cooperative energy storage system: optimizing sizing and comparing rule-based strategies Energy. 2023; 281, 128273 Crossref Scopus (15) Google Scholar
  6. [7]7. Baik, E. ∙ Chawla, K.P. ∙ Jenkins, J.D. ... What is different about different net-zero carbon electricity systems? Energy Clim. Change. 2021; 2, 100046 Crossref Scopus (54) PubMed Google Scholar
  7. [10]10. Dowling, J.A. ∙ Rinaldi, K.Z. ∙ Ruggles, T.H. ... Role of long-duration energy storage inVariable renewable electricity systems Joule. 2020; 4:1907-1928 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (323) Google Scholar
  8. [11]11. Schmidt, O. ∙ Melchior, S. ∙ Hawkes, A. ... Projecting the future levelized cost of electricity storage technologies Joule. 2019; 3:81-100 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (595) Google Scholar
  9. [12]12. Sepulveda, N.A. ∙ Jenkins, J.D. ∙ Edington, A. ... The design space for long-duration energy storage in decarbonized power systems Nat. Energy. 2021; 6:506-516 Crossref Scopus (322) Google Scholar
  10. [13]13. Denholm, P. ∙ Mai, T. Timescales of energy storage needed for reducing renewable energy curtailment Renew. Energy. 2019; 130:388-399 Crossref Scopus (144) Google Scholar
  11. [14]14. Guerra, O.J. ∙ Eichman, J. ∙ Denholm, P. Optimal energy storage portfolio for high and ultrahigh carbon-free and renewable power systems Energy Environ. Sci. 2021; 14:5132-5146 Crossref Google Scholar
  12. [15]15. Ziegler, M.S. ∙ Mueller, J.M. ∙ Pereira, G.D. ... Storage requirements and costs of shaping renewable energy toward grid decarbonization Joule. 2019; 3:2134-2153 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (309) Google Scholar
  13. [16]16. Victoria, M. ∙ Zhu, K. ∙ Brown, T. ... The role of storage technologies throughout the decarbonisation of the sector-coupled European energy system Energy Convers. Manag. 2019; 201, 111977 Crossref Google Scholar
  14. [17]17. Jafari, M. ∙ Botterud, A. ∙ Sakti, A. Decarbonizing power systems: A critical review of the role of energy storage Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022; 158, 112077 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
  15. [18]18. Cárdenas, B. ∙ Swinfen-Styles, L. ∙ Rouse, J. ... Short-, medium-, and long-duration energy storage in a 100% renewable electricity grid: a UK Case study Energies. 2021; 14, 8524 Crossref Scopus (29) Google Scholar
  16. [19]19. Jafari, M. ∙ Korpås, M. ∙ Botterud, A. Power system decarbonization: impacts of energy storage duration and interannual renewables variability Renew. Energy. 2020; 156:1171-1185 Crossref Scopus (72) Google Scholar
  17. [20]20. Guerra, K. ∙ Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R. ∙ Guerra, O.J. ... Opportunities for low-carbon generation and storage technologies to decarbonise the future power system Appl. Energy. 2023; 336, 120828 Crossref Scopus (19) Google Scholar
  18. [21]21. Guerra, O.J. ∙ Tejada, D.A. ∙ Reklaitis, G.V. An optimization framework for the integrated planning of generation and transmission expansion in interconnected power systems Appl. Energy. 2016; 170:1-21 Crossref Scopus (112) Google Scholar
  19. [22]22. Mallapragada, D.S. ∙ Sepulveda, N.A. ∙ Jenkins, J.D. Long-run system value of battery energy storage in future grids with increasing wind and solar generation Appl. Energy. 2020; 275, 115390 Crossref Scopus (122) PubMed Google Scholar
  20. [23]23. Jorgenson, J. ∙ Denholm, P. ∙ Mai, T. Analyzing storage for wind integration in a transmission-constrained power system Appl. Energy. 2018; 228:122-129 Crossref Scopus (43) Google Scholar
  21. [24]24. Conlon, T. ∙ Waite, M. ∙ Modi, V. Assessing new transmission and energy storage in achieving increasing renewable generation targets in a regional grid Appl. Energy. 2019; 250:1085-1098 Crossref Scopus (59) Google Scholar
  22. [25]25. Liu, H. ∙ Brown, T. ∙ Andresen, G.B. ... The role of hydro power, storage and transmission in the decarbonization of the Chinese power system Appl. Energy. 2019; 239:1308-1321 Crossref Scopus (89) Google Scholar
  23. [26]26. Mileva, A. ∙ Johnston, J. ∙ Nelson, J.H. ... Power system balancing for deep decarbonization of the electricity sector Appl. Energy. 2016; 162:1001-1009 Crossref Scopus (128) Google Scholar
  24. [27]27. Go, R.S. ∙ Munoz, F.D. ∙ Watson, J.-P. Assessing the economic value of co-optimized grid-scale energy storage investments in supporting high renewable portfolio standards Appl. Energy. 2016; 183:902-913 Crossref Scopus (87) Google Scholar
  25. [28]28. Cebulla, F. ∙ Haas, J. ∙ Eichman, J. ... How much electrical energy storage do we need? A synthesis for the U.S., Europe, and Germany J. Clean. Prod. 2018; 181:449-459 Crossref Scopus (154) Google Scholar
  26. [29]29. Moser, M. ∙ Gils, H.-C. ∙ Pivaro, G. A sensitivity analysis on large-scale electrical energy storage requirements in Europe under consideration of innovative storage technologies J. Clean. Prod. 2020; 269, 122261 Crossref Scopus (32) PubMed Google Scholar
  27. [31]31. Brown, P.R. ∙ Botterud, A. The value of inter-regional coordination and transmission in decarbonizing the US electricity system Joule. 2021; 5:115-134 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (107) Google Scholar
  28. [33]33. Davis, L.W. ∙ Hausman, C. ∙ Rose, N.L. Transmission impossible? Prospects for decarbonizing the US grid Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2023; 37:155-180 Crossref Scopus (8) Google Scholar
  29. [36]36. Wilberforce, T. ∙ Baroutaji, A. ∙ Soudan, B. ... Outlook of carbon capture technology and challenges Sci. Total Environ. 2019; 657:56-72 Crossref Scopus (348) PubMed Google Scholar
  30. [37]37. Wilberforce, T. ∙ Olabi, A.G. ∙ Sayed, E.T. ... Progress in carbon capture technologies Sci. Total Environ. 2021; 761, 143203 Crossref Scopus (433) PubMed Google Scholar
  31. [38]38. Maestre, V.M. ∙ Ortiz, A. ∙ Ortiz, I. Challenges and prospects of renewable hydrogen-based strategies for full decarbonization of stationary power applications Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021; 152, 111628 Crossref Scopus (157) Google Scholar
  32. [44]44. Baik, E. ∙ Siala, K. ∙ Hamacher, T. ... California’s approach to decarbonizing the electricity sector and the role of dispatchable, low-carbon technologies Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 2022; 113, 103527 Crossref Scopus (13) Google Scholar
  33. [45]45. Baik, E. ∙ Benson, S.M. The role of carbon capture and storage in decarbonizing California’s electricity grid SSRN Electron. J. 2021; Crossref Google Scholar
  34. [47]47. de Sisternes, F.J. ∙ Jenkins, J.D. ∙ Botterud, A. The value of energy storage in decarbonizing the electricity sector Appl. Energy. 2016; 175:368-379 Crossref Scopus (338) Google Scholar
  35. [48]48. Li, Z. ∙ Pan, M.S. ∙ Su, L. ... Air-breathing aqueous sulfur flow battery for ultralow-cost long-duration electrical storage Joule. 2017; 1:306-327 Full Text Full Text (PDF) Scopus (168) Google Scholar
  36. [49]49. Gifford, J. ∙ Ma, Z. ∙ Davenport, P. Thermal analysis of insulation design for a thermal energy storage silo containment for long-duration electricity storage Front. Energy Res. 2020; 8, 99 Crossref Scopus (19) PubMed Google Scholar
  37. [51]51. Jülch, V. Comparison of electricity storage options using levelized cost of storage (LCOS) method Appl. Energy. 2016; 183:1594-1606 Crossref Scopus (342) Google Scholar
  38. [52]52. Zakeri, B. ∙ Syri, S. Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015; 42:569-596 Crossref Scopus (1387) Google Scholar

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chu, A. K., Baik, E., & Benson, S. M.
Venue
Cell Reports Sustainability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
100285
ISSN
2949-7906
Cited by
4
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review