The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent trends in solid waste management status, challenges, and potential for the future Indian cities – A review
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, the exponential population growth, high density of urban areas, diverse culture, changing food habits, and lifestyles have seen an unresolved problem in terms of Municipal Solid Waste Management (MSWM) in India. Consequently, the municipalities have been facing many other issues related to the collection, treatment, and management of solid waste. The present study is a comprehensive review summarising the present SWM status identifying the associated challenges and deriving potential solutions for the MSWM in the Indian context. The unsorted solid waste at source, social taboo, citizen's attitude, poor assessment, inadequate potential strategies unorganised informal sector of waste, unplanned fiscal, and poor implementation government policies. The discussion in this review article concludes, there is an urgent need for adequate treatment and recycling strategies required to be adopted as per the Indian solid waste composition. The appropriate implications of the potential solutions for MSW at the centralised and decentralised level need to be emphasised through various available of scientific treatment processes. Hence municipalities, along with the involvement of informal sectors, private agencies required to focus on creating potential opportunities and achieves the long term goal of the MSWM sustainability for Indian cities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plastic debris in the open ocean
Cózar, A., Echevarría, F., González-Gordillo, J. I., Irigoien, X., Úbeda, B., Hernández-León, S., Palma, Á. T., Navarro, S., García-de-Lomas, J., Ruiz, A., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1314705111 · Cited by 3,133
What a Waste : A Global Review of Solid Waste Management
Hoornweg, D., & Bhada-Tata, P. (2012) · doi:10.1596/17388 · Cited by 3,129
Pandiyan, K., Singh, A., Singh, S., Saxena, A. K., & Nain, L. (2019) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.049 · Cited by 166
Cited by
Zhang, Z., Chen, Z., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Chen, L., Yang, M., Osman, A. I., Farghali, M., Liu, E., Hassan, D., et al. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172794 · Cited by 384
Ghalkhani, M., Teymourinia, H., Ebrahimi, F., Irannejad, N., Karimi-Maleh, H., Karaman, C., Karimi, F., Dragoi, E. N., Lichtfouse, E., & Singh, J. (2023) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124585 · Cited by 24
Kumar, N., & Gupta, S. K. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128600 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, A., & Agrawal, A.
- Venue
- Current Research in Environmental Sustainability
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 100011
- ISSN
- 2666-0490 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3089579812
- Cited by
- 383
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent trends in solid waste management status, challenges, and potential for the future Indian cities – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.crsust.2020.100011
- The paper
- Kumar, A., & Agrawal, A. (2020). Recent trends in solid waste management status, challenges, and potential for the future Indian cities – A review. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2020.100011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.