The origin, ultrastructure, and microbiology of the sediment accumulating in liquid nitrogen storage vessels
Abstract
During long-term cryopreservation, ice sediment accumulates in storage Dewars and poses a risk of microbial contamination to stored samples. Ice accumulates in liquid nitrogen via two general processes: (1) ice forming in the atmosphere above an open Dewar falls into the vessel; and (2) ice forming on cold surfaces of the Dewar or inventory system enters the liquid nitrogen. These ice crystals aggregate and entrap other materials, such as bacteria, fungal spores, and general laboratory debris present within the liquid nitrogen. Measured changes in the ultrastructure of ice aggregates following long-term storage are consistent with transient warming events to temperatures of -100 degrees C. Bacteria were identified in all samples and filamentous fungi in 9 out of 10 samples. These micro-organisms are commonly found in the environment and would not be expected to have been derived from IVF samples. Some of the bacteria identified are associated with nosocomial infections in humans. The implications that the association of microbial contamination with ice crystals has on cryopreservation procedures are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Potential sources of viral contamination include the operator, cell culture reagents of animal origin, cells or tissues of human origin (including feeder cells), and even contamination derived from liquid nitrogen storage vessels.
“In cell culture, there are also various potential sources of viral contamination, including the operator, cell culture reagents of animal origin, cells or tissues of human origin (including feeder cells), and even contamination derived from liquid nitrogen storage vessels (Fountain et al., 1997; Grout and Morris, 2009; Morris, 2005).”
From Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0) (2021) · cites this paper as Morris, 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0)
Pamies, D. (2021) · ALTEX · doi:10.14573/altex.2111011 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morris, G. J.
- Venue
- Cryobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 231-238
- ISSN
- 0011-2240
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review