Cited by 17Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Long-term cryopreservation of reaggregated pancreatic islets resulting in successful transplantation in rats

Rawal, Sonia, Harrington, Stephen, Williams, S. Janette, Ramachandran, Karthik, Stehno-Bittel, Lisa·2017·Cryobiology

Abstract

Preservation of pancreatic islets for long-term storage of islets used for transplantation or research has long been a goal. Unfortunately, few studies on long-term islet cryopreservation (1 month and longer) have reported positive outcomes in terms of islet yield, survival and function. In general, single cells have been shown to tolerate the cryopreservation procedure better than tissues/multicellular structures like islets. Thus, we optimized a method to cryopreserve single islet cells and, after thawing, reaggregated them into islet spheroids. Cryopreserved (CP) single human islet cells formed spheroids efficiently within 3-5 days after thawing. Approximately 79% of islet cells were recovered following the single-cell cryopreservation protocol. Viability after long-term cryopreservation (4 weeks or more) was significantly higher in the CP islet cell spheroids (97.4 ± 0.4%) compared to CP native islets (14.6 ± 0.4%). Moreover, CP islet cell spheroids had excellent viability even after weeks in culture (88.5 ± 1.6%). Metabolic activity was 4-5 times higher in CP islet cell spheroids than CP native islets at 24 and 48 h after thawing. Diabetic rats transplanted with CP islet cell spheroids were normoglycemic for 10 months, identical to diabetic rats transplanted with fresh islets. However, the animals receiving fresh islets required a higher volume of transplanted tissue to achieve normoglycemia compared to those transplanted with CP islet cell spheroids. By cryopreserving s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.04.010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Better viability and post-thaw function has been achieved by dispersing islets, freezing them as single cells, and then reaggregating them into clusters upon thaw.

    “Better viability and post-thaw function has been achieved by dispersing islets, freezing them as single cells, and then reaggregating them into clusters upon thaw.186,187”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 58 · Cited by 17

Authors
Rawal, S., Harrington, S., Williams, S. J., Ramachandran, K., & Stehno-Bittel, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
  • University of Kansas (US)
Venue
Cryobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
76
Pages
41-50
ISSN
0011-2240 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2611779479
Cited by
17
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cryobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Likarda, LLC
  • Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Keywords
islet transplantation, diabetes reversal, islet viability, human islets, normoglycemia
MeSH terms
Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Humans, Islets of Langerhans, Organ Preservation, Cryopreservation, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review