Long-term cryopreservation of reaggregated pancreatic islets resulting in successful transplantation in rats
Abstract
Preservation of pancreatic islets for long-term storage of islets used for transplantation or research has long been a goal. Unfortunately, few studies on long-term islet cryopreservation (1 month and longer) have reported positive outcomes in terms of islet yield, survival and function. In general, single cells have been shown to tolerate the cryopreservation procedure better than tissues/multicellular structures like islets. Thus, we optimized a method to cryopreserve single islet cells and, after thawing, reaggregated them into islet spheroids. Cryopreserved (CP) single human islet cells formed spheroids efficiently within 3-5 days after thawing. Approximately 79% of islet cells were recovered following the single-cell cryopreservation protocol. Viability after long-term cryopreservation (4 weeks or more) was significantly higher in the CP islet cell spheroids (97.4 ± 0.4%) compared to CP native islets (14.6 ± 0.4%). Moreover, CP islet cell spheroids had excellent viability even after weeks in culture (88.5 ± 1.6%). Metabolic activity was 4-5 times higher in CP islet cell spheroids than CP native islets at 24 and 48 h after thawing. Diabetic rats transplanted with CP islet cell spheroids were normoglycemic for 10 months, identical to diabetic rats transplanted with fresh islets. However, the animals receiving fresh islets required a higher volume of transplanted tissue to achieve normoglycemia compared to those transplanted with CP islet cell spheroids. By cryopreserving s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Better viability and post-thaw function has been achieved by dispersing islets, freezing them as single cells, and then reaggregating them into clusters upon thaw.
“Better viability and post-thaw function has been achieved by dispersing islets, freezing them as single cells, and then reaggregating them into clusters upon thaw.186,187”
From Developments in stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy for treating type 1 diabetes (2023) · cites this paper as [186]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 58 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Rawal, S., Harrington, S., Williams, S. J., Ramachandran, K., & Stehno-Bittel, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Venue
- Cryobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- 41-50
- ISSN
- 0011-2240 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2611779479
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 1.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cryobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Likarda, LLC
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Kansas Medical Center
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Keywords
- islet transplantation, diabetes reversal, islet viability, human islets, normoglycemia
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental, Humans, Islets of Langerhans, Organ Preservation, Cryopreservation, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review