Benchmarking algorithms for pathway activity transformation of single-cell RNA-seq data
Open accessAbstract
Biological pathway analysis provides new insights for cell clustering and functional annotation from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Many pathway analysis algorithms have been developed to transform gene-level scRNA-seq data into functional gene sets representing pathways or biological processes. Here, we collected seven widely-used pathway activity transformation algorithms and 32 available datasets based on 16 scRNA-seq techniques. We proposed a comprehensive framework to evaluate their accuracy, stability and scalability. The assessment of scRNA-seq preprocessing showed that cell filtering had the less impact on scRNA-seq pathway analysis, while data normalization of sctransform and scran had a consistent well impact across all tools. We found that Pagoda2 yielded the best overall performance with the highest accuracy, scalability, and stability. Meanwhile, the tool PLAGE exhibited the highest stability, as well as moderate accuracy and scalability.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some single-cell-based enrichment methods, namely Pagoda2, might outperform bulk methods.
“but some single-cell-based methods, namely Pagoda2 (ref. 104), might outperform them105.”
From Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023) · cites this paper as [105]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 79
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [16]Barbie DA, Tamayo P, Boehm JS, Kim SY, Susan E, Dunn IF, et al. Processing-a-Programming-Handbook-for-Visual-Designers-and-Artists.Pdf 2010;462:108–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08460.Systematic. · DOI
- [48]Mereu E, Lafzi A, Moutinho C, Ziegenhain C, Maccarthy DJ, Alvarez A, et al. Benchmarking Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Protocols for Cell Atlas Projects n.d. 32518403
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Ma, Y., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Q., Zhou, M., & Su, J.
- Affiliations
- Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Su, Jianzhong
- Venue
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 2953-2961
- ISSN
- 2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7642725
- OpenAlex
- W3093169545
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Science Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR19C060001)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61871294, 61902352)
- Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- single-cell RNA sequencing, benchmarking, cell filtering, data normalization, plage, scalability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review