Cited by 79Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Benchmarking algorithms for pathway activity transformation of single-cell RNA-seq data

Open access
Zhang, Yaru, Ma, Yunlong, Huang, Yukuan, Zhang, Yan, Jiang, Qi, Zhou, Meng, Su, Jianzhong·2020·Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal

Abstract

Biological pathway analysis provides new insights for cell clustering and functional annotation from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Many pathway analysis algorithms have been developed to transform gene-level scRNA-seq data into functional gene sets representing pathways or biological processes. Here, we collected seven widely-used pathway activity transformation algorithms and 32 available datasets based on 16 scRNA-seq techniques. We proposed a comprehensive framework to evaluate their accuracy, stability and scalability. The assessment of scRNA-seq preprocessing showed that cell filtering had the less impact on scRNA-seq pathway analysis, while data normalization of sctransform and scran had a consistent well impact across all tools. We found that Pagoda2 yielded the best overall performance with the highest accuracy, scalability, and stability. Meanwhile, the tool PLAGE exhibited the highest stability, as well as moderate accuracy and scalability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.10.007

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some single-cell-based enrichment methods, namely Pagoda2, might outperform bulk methods.

    “but some single-cell-based methods, namely Pagoda2 (ref. 104), might outperform them105.”

    From Best practices for single-cell analysis across modalities (2023) · cites this paper as [105]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 79

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [16]Barbie DA, Tamayo P, Boehm JS, Kim SY, Susan E, Dunn IF, et al. Processing-a-Programming-Handbook-for-Visual-Designers-and-Artists.Pdf 2010;462:108–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08460.Systematic. · DOI
  2. [48]Mereu E, Lafzi A, Moutinho C, Ziegenhain C, Maccarthy DJ, Alvarez A, et al. Benchmarking Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Protocols for Cell Atlas Projects n.d. 32518403

Authors
Zhang, Y., Ma, Y., Huang, Y., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Q., Zhou, M., & Su, J.
Affiliations
Wenzhou Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Su, Jianzhong
Venue
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
Published
2020-01
Volume
18
Pages
2953-2961
ISSN
2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093169545
Cited by
79
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Science Research Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LR19C060001)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61871294, 61902352)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, benchmarking, cell filtering, data normalization, plage, scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review