The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate brain tumor detection using deep convolutional neural network
Open accessAbstract
Detection and Classification of a brain tumor is an important step to better understanding its mechanism. Magnetic Reasoning Imaging (MRI) is an experimental medical imaging technique that helps the radiologist find the tumor region. However, it is a time taking process and requires expertise to test the MRI images, manually. Nowadays, the advancement of Computer-assisted Diagnosis (CAD), machine learning, and deep learning in specific allow the radiologist to more reliably identify brain tumors. The traditional machine learning methods used to tackle this problem require a handcrafted feature for classification purposes. Whereas deep learning methods can be designed in a way to not require any handcrafted feature extraction while achieving accurate classification results. This paper proposes two deep learning models to identify both binary (normal and abnormal) and multiclass (meningioma, glioma, and pituitary) brain tumors. We use two publicly available datasets that include 3064 and 152 MRI images, respectively. To build our models, we first apply a 23-layers convolution neural network (CNN) to the first dataset since there is a large number of MRI images for the training purpose. However, when dealing with limited volumes of data, which is the case in the second dataset, our proposed "23-layers CNN" architecture faces overfitting problem. To address this issue, we use transfer learning and combine VGG16 architecture along with the reflection of our proposed "23 layers CNN" architecture. Finally, we compare our proposed models with those reported in the literature. Our experimental results indicate that our models achieve up to 97.8% and 100% classification accuracy for our employed datasets, respectively, exceeding all other state-of-the-art models. Our proposed models, employed datasets, and all the source codes are publicly available at: (https://github.com/saikat15010/Brain-Tumor-Detection).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Arif, M., Ajesh, F., Shamsudheen, S., Geman, O., Izdrui, D., & Vicoveanu, D. I. (2022) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1155/2022/2693621 · Cited by 155
RetractedGradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary
Louis, D. N., Perry, A., Reifenberger, G., von Deimling, A., Figarella-Branger, D., Cavenee, W. K., Ohgaki, H., Wiestler, O. D., Kleihues, P., & Ellison, D. W. (2016) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 · Cited by 15,657
Shin, H.-C., Roth, H. R., Gao, M., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Nogues, I., Yao, J., Mollura, D., & Summers, R. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162 · Cited by 5,759 · cited 1×
“Such knowledge helps the model to achieve high accuracy on a small dataset [23].”
BackgroundPrimary brain tumours in adults
Ricard, D., Idbaih, A., Ducray, F., Lahutte, M., Hoang-Xuan, K., & Delattre, J.-Y. (2012) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)61346-9 · Cited by 1,201
Understanding Data Augmentation for Classification: When to Warp?
Wong, S. C., Gatt, A., Stamatescu, V., & McDonnell, M. D. (2016) · 2016 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA) · doi:10.1109/dicta.2016.7797091 · Cited by 1,007
Machine Learning Methods for Histopathological Image Analysis
Komura, D., & Ishikawa, S. (2018) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2018.01.001 · Cited by 937
Multi-grade brain tumor classification using deep CNN with extensive data augmentation
Sajjad, M., Khan, S., Muhammad, K., Wu, W., Ullah, A., & Baik, S. W. (2019) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2018.12.003 · Cited by 891
Enhanced Performance of Brain Tumor Classification via Tumor Region Augmentation and Partition
Cheng, J., Huang, W., Cao, S., Yang, R., Yang, W., Yun, Z., Wang, Z., & Feng, Q. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140381 · Cited by 879
Cited by
Next-generation agentic AI for transforming healthcare
Karunanayake, N. (2025) · Informatics and Health · doi:10.1016/j.infoh.2025.03.001 · Cited by 165
Enhancing brain tumor detection in MRI images using YOLO-NeuroBoost model
Chen, A., Lin, D., & Gao, Q. (2024) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1445882 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, M. S. I., Rahman, A., Debnath, T., Karim, M. R., Nasir, M. K., Band, S. S., Mosavi, A., & Dehzangi, I.
- Venue
- Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 4733-4745
- ISSN
- 2001-0370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4293340419
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 24.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate brain tumor detection using deep convolutional neural network. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.08.039
- The paper
- Khan, M. S. I., Rahman, A., Debnath, T., Karim, M. R., Nasir, M. K., Band, S. S., Mosavi, A., & Dehzangi, I. (2022). Accurate brain tumor detection using deep convolutional neural network. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2022.08.039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.