Vibration-based approach for structural health monitoring of ultra-high-performance concrete bridge
Open accessAbstract
Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is a valuable tool for keeping track of the performance and health of engineering structures over extended periods. The purpose of SHM is to ensure structural safety by relying on information derived from real-time measured data and offer suitable recommendations for the structure's maintenance and management. The fundamental idea of SHM is that the structure's response to vibrations will change noticeably if its mass or stiffness is altered. It is a way to keep tabs on how well a building keeps itself safe and sound with as little human intervention as possible. Throughout this research, a Finite Element (FE) model was updated, and an ambient vibration test was performed on an Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) bridge, given its slimmer as well as lighter properties to get modal parameters, including natural frequency and mode shape. Measured modal parameters were acquired and verified with the aid of several Operation Modal Analysis (OMA) techniques, and the FE model has then modified accordingly. The bridge's condition was evaluated and predicted using a mathematical method called simple linear regression, which considered the variations in natural frequency produced by the structure's mass and stiffness. The findings indicate that the stiffness index ratio is a practical and efficient tool for evaluating the bridge's effectiveness. The applied method demonstrated the Sungai Raia bridge's safe functioning in real-world situations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modal variations induced by traffic can be considered to arise in dynamic and static forms.
“The modal variations induced by traffic can be considered to arise in dynamic and static forms [200,201].”
From Effects of Environmental and Operational Conditions on Structural Health Monitoring and Non-Destructive Testing: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [200]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Keshmiry, A., Hassani, S., Mousavi, M., & Dackermann, U. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13040918 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Saidin, S. S., Kudus, S. A., Jamadin, A., Anuar, M. A., Amin, N. M., Ya, A. B. Z., & Sugiura, K.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul
- Venue
- Case Studies in Construction Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-07
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- e01752
- ISSN
- 2214-5095 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4311538194
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11
- FWCI
- 4.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Case Studies in Construction Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Universiti Teknologi MARA (002/2022, 600‐TNCPI 5/3/DDF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
- Keywords
- structural health monitoring, ultra-high performance concrete, bridge structures, ambient vibration testing, finite element model updating, natural frequencies, mode shapes, linear regression, structural assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review