Cited by 45Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisStructural Engineering and Materials Analysis

Vibration-based approach for structural health monitoring of ultra-high-performance concrete bridge

Open access
Saidin, Siti Shahirah, Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul, Jamadin, Adiza, Anuar, Muhamad Azhan, Amin, Norliyati Mohd, Ya, Atikah Bt Zakaria, Sugiura, Kunitomo·2023·Case Studies in Construction Materials

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) is a valuable tool for keeping track of the performance and health of engineering structures over extended periods. The purpose of SHM is to ensure structural safety by relying on information derived from real-time measured data and offer suitable recommendations for the structure's maintenance and management. The fundamental idea of SHM is that the structure's response to vibrations will change noticeably if its mass or stiffness is altered. It is a way to keep tabs on how well a building keeps itself safe and sound with as little human intervention as possible. Throughout this research, a Finite Element (FE) model was updated, and an ambient vibration test was performed on an Ultra-High-Performance Concrete (UHPC) bridge, given its slimmer as well as lighter properties to get modal parameters, including natural frequency and mode shape. Measured modal parameters were acquired and verified with the aid of several Operation Modal Analysis (OMA) techniques, and the FE model has then modified accordingly. The bridge's condition was evaluated and predicted using a mathematical method called simple linear regression, which considered the variations in natural frequency produced by the structure's mass and stiffness. The findings indicate that the stiffness index ratio is a practical and efficient tool for evaluating the bridge's effectiveness. The applied method demonstrated the Sungai Raia bridge's safe functioning in real-world situations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01752

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saidin, S. S., Kudus, S. A., Jamadin, A., Anuar, M. A., Amin, N. M., Ya, A. B. Z., & Sugiura, K.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA System (MY)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kudus, Sakhiah Abdul
Venue
Case Studies in Construction Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
18
Pages
e01752
ISSN
2214-5095 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311538194
Cited by
45
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Case Studies in Construction Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Universiti Teknologi MARA (002/2022, 600‐TNCPI 5/3/DDF)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
Keywords
structural health monitoring, ultra-high performance concrete, bridge structures, ambient vibration testing, finite element model updating, natural frequencies, mode shapes, linear regression, structural assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review