Robust variance estimation for random effects meta-analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-independence of multiple effect sizes from the same sample was accounted for by robust variance estimation.
“we accounted for this non-independence by robust variance estimation (RVE, Sidik and Jonkman, 2006; Hedges et al., 2010).”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Sidik and Jonkman, 2006
Robust variance estimation allows integration of statistically dependent effect sizes without knowledge of the underlying covariance structure.
“This method allows the integration of statistically dependent effect sizes within a meta-analysis without knowledge of the underlying covariance structure among effect sizes.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Sidik and Jonkman, 2006
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Sidik, K., & Jonkman, J. N.
- Affiliations
- Wyeth (US)
- Mississippi State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jonkman, Jeffrey N.
- ORCID
- Jonkman, Jeffrey N.
- Venue
- Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3681-3701
- ISSN
- 0167-9473 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2003862733
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computational Statistics & Data Analysis (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- robust variance estimation, random-effects meta-analysis, asymptotic variance, robust inference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
