Two-way imputation: a Bayesian method for estimating missing scores in tests and questionnaires, and an accurate approximation
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Missing item scores for six patients were imputed using two-way imputation.
“The only missing item score for the remaining six patients was imputed using two-way imputation (56, 57).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 46
- Authors
- Van Ginkel, J. R., Andries Van der Ark, L., Sijtsma, K., & Vermunt, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Venue
- Computational Statistics & Data Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-05
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 4013-4027
- ISSN
- 0167-9473 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097295325
- Cited by
- 46
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Computational Statistics & Data Analysis (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Keywords
- multiple imputation, missing data, test scores, questionnaire data, data augmentation, Bayesian imputation, Cronbach's alpha, principal component analysis, factor loadings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
