Cited by 104Web Application Security VulnerabilitiesSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesSecurity and Verification in Computing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exploring software security approaches in software development lifecycle: A systematic mapping study

Mohammed, Nabil M., Niazi, Mahmood, Alshayeb, Mohammad, Mahmood, Sajjad·2017·Computer Standards & Interfaces

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.csi.2016.10.001

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. McGraw, 2006
  2. McGraw, 2004
  3. Sindre, 2004, Eliciting security requirements with misuse cases, Requir. Eng., 10, 34, 10.1007/s00766-004-0194-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 104

Metadata

Authors
Mohammed, N. M., Niazi, M., Alshayeb, M., & Mahmood, S.
Affiliations
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
Corresponding author
Niazi, Mahmood
Venue
Computer Standards & Interfaces
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
50
Pages
107-115
ISSN
0920-5489 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2529133275
Cited by
104
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5
FWCI
16.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computer Standards & Interfaces (publishedVersion)
Funders
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (IN141011)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
Keywords
software security, software development lifecycle, vulnerability detection, vulnerability reduction, static analysis, dynamic analysis, security requirements engineering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review