Unlimited vocabulary speech recognition with morph language models applied to Finnish
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Subword models have been successfully used in Finnish ASR for more than a decade.
“Subword models have been successfully used in Finnish ASR for more than a decade [2].”
From Automatic Speech Recognition With Very Large Conversational Finnish and Estonian Vocabularies (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Automatic Speech Recognition With Very Large Conversational Finnish and Estonian Vocabularies
Enarvi, S., Smit, P., Virpioja, S., & Kurimo, M. (2017) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2017.2743344 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Subword models have been successfully used in Finnish ASR for more than a decade [2].”
MethodResultSelf-citation
- Authors
- Hirsimäki, T., Creutz, M., Siivola, V., Kurimo, M., Virpioja, S., & Pylkkönen, J.
- Corresponding author
- Hirsimäki, Teemu
- Venue
- Computer Speech & Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 515-541
- ISSN
- 0885-2308 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069712814
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 9.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer Speech & Language (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- minimum description length, n-gram language models, decoding, grammatical rules
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
