An automatic Alzheimer’s disease classifier based on spontaneous spoken English
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bertini et al. achieved accuracy 0.933 and F1 0.885 on Dementia-Bank Pitt using spectrogram.
“| Bertini et al. [76] | spectrogram | specch | Dementia- Bank Pitt | Accuracy is 0.933, F1 score is 0.885 |”
From A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis (2024) · cites this paper as [76]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 66
- Authors
- Bertini, F., Allevi, D., Lutero, G., Calzà, L., & Montesi, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Parma (IT)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Bertini, Flavio
- Venue
- Computer Speech & Language
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-03
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 101298
- ISSN
- 0885-2308 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3201447839
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Computer Speech & Language (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, dementia detection, spontaneous speech, spectrogram features, artificial neural networks, data augmentation, DementiaBank, neuropsychological screening, early cognitive impairment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
