Cited by 72Acupuncture Treatment Research StudiesTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Acupuncture for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Chen, Chao, Liu, Jia, Sun, Mengxiao, Liu, Weihong, Han, Juan, Wang, Hongcai·2019·Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background Acupuncture has been used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for 2000 years and there are emerging clinical evidence and animal studies for its efficacy. However, we are unable to conclude the effectiveness and safety on this issue yet.Objectives To assess the effects and safety of acupuncture for T2DM.Methods We systematically searched 5 databases and 2 clinical registry platforms from inception to 2018-6-4. RCTs for acupuncture or its variants compared with sham acupuncture or no acupuncture controls for T2DM were included. The primary outcomes were glycemic control and adverse events.Results A total of 21 studies, which comprised a total of 1943 participants, were included in the final meta-analysis. Compared with sham acupuncture or no acupuncture plus baseline treatments, acupuncture plus baseline treatments yield reduction in FBG(MD 1.21 mmol/l, 95%CI 1.56 to 0.87), 2 h BG(MD 2.13 mmol/l, 95%CI 2.79 to 1.46), HA1c (MD 1.12%, 95%CI 1.62 to 0.62). Our results also show acupuncture can improve blood lipids and blood pressure control, and reduce weight.Conclusions As one type of multifactorial intervention, acupuncture could be recommended as a supplementary treatment in the management of T2DM, especially in those with obesity or metabolic disorders. However, due to the small sample size, poor methodological quality of trials reviewed, the amount of evidence is not fully convincing. There is a need for well-planned, long-term studies.Registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Number CRD42018094573).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.04.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent review examining safety and effectiveness of acupuncture for T2DM did not find convincing evidence but indicated acupuncture may be recommended as supplementary treatment.

    “In a recent review examining the safety and effectiveness of acupuncture for T2DM, reviewers again did not find convincing evidence but indicated that acupuncture may be recommended to patients as a supplementary treatment [57].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 72

Authors
Chen, C., Liu, J., Sun, M., Liu, W., Han, J., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Hongcai
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
36
Pages
100-112
ISSN
1744-3881 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954243293
Cited by
72
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
acupuncture, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, serum lipids, blood pressure, weight loss, sham acupuncture, adverse events, obesity, complementary therapy
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Acupuncture Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review