Acupuncture for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Background Acupuncture has been used to treat type 2 diabetes (T2DM) for 2000 years and there are emerging clinical evidence and animal studies for its efficacy. However, we are unable to conclude the effectiveness and safety on this issue yet.Objectives To assess the effects and safety of acupuncture for T2DM.Methods We systematically searched 5 databases and 2 clinical registry platforms from inception to 2018-6-4. RCTs for acupuncture or its variants compared with sham acupuncture or no acupuncture controls for T2DM were included. The primary outcomes were glycemic control and adverse events.Results A total of 21 studies, which comprised a total of 1943 participants, were included in the final meta-analysis. Compared with sham acupuncture or no acupuncture plus baseline treatments, acupuncture plus baseline treatments yield reduction in FBG(MD 1.21 mmol/l, 95%CI 1.56 to 0.87), 2 h BG(MD 2.13 mmol/l, 95%CI 2.79 to 1.46), HA1c (MD 1.12%, 95%CI 1.62 to 0.62). Our results also show acupuncture can improve blood lipids and blood pressure control, and reduce weight.Conclusions As one type of multifactorial intervention, acupuncture could be recommended as a supplementary treatment in the management of T2DM, especially in those with obesity or metabolic disorders. However, due to the small sample size, poor methodological quality of trials reviewed, the amount of evidence is not fully convincing. There is a need for well-planned, long-term studies.Registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Number CRD42018094573).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A recent review examining safety and effectiveness of acupuncture for T2DM did not find convincing evidence but indicated acupuncture may be recommended as supplementary treatment.
“In a recent review examining the safety and effectiveness of acupuncture for T2DM, reviewers again did not find convincing evidence but indicated that acupuncture may be recommended to patients as a supplementary treatment [57].”
From Evaluating Traditional Chinese Medicine and Herbal Products for the Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (2019) · cites this paper as [57]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Chen, C., Liu, J., Sun, M., Liu, W., Han, J., & Wang, H.
- Affiliations
- China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Hongcai
- Venue
- Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 100-112
- ISSN
- 1744-3881 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2954243293
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- acupuncture, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, serum lipids, blood pressure, weight loss, sham acupuncture, adverse events, obesity, complementary therapy
- MeSH terms
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Acupuncture Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review