The Spinocerebellar Ataxia 8 Noncoding RNA Causes Neurodegeneration and Associates with Staufen in Drosophila
Open accessAbstract
Spinocerebellar Ataxia 8 (SCA8) appears unique among triplet repeat expansion-induced neurodegenerative diseases because the predicted gene product is a noncoding RNA. Little is currently known about the normal function of SCA8 in neuronal survival or how repeat expansion contributes to neurodegeneration. To investigate the molecular context in which SCA8 operates, we have expressed the human SCA8 noncoding RNA in Drosophila. SCA8 induces late-onset, progressive neurodegeneration in the Drosophila retina. Using this neurodegenerative phenotype as a sensitized background for a genetic modifier screen, we have identified mutations in four genes: staufen, muscle-blind, split ends, and CG3249. All four encode neuronally expressed RNA binding proteins conserved in Drosophila and humans. Although expression of both wild-type and repeat-expanded SCA8 induce neurodegeneration, the strength of interaction with certain modifiers differs between the two SCA8 backgrounds, suggesting that CUG expansions alter associations with specific RNA binding proteins. Our demonstration that SCA8 can recruit Staufen and that the interaction domain maps to the portion of the SCA8 RNA that undergoes repeat expansion in the human disease suggests a specific mechanism for SCA8 function and disease. Genetic modifiers identified in our SCA8-based screens may provide candidates for designing therapeutic interventions to treat this disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other genetic screens of polyQ toxicity have uncovered RNA-binding proteins, but those genes do not overlap with the modifiers presented in this study.
“Other genetic screens of polyQ toxicity have also uncovered RNA-binding proteins (77–79), although those genes identified do not overlap with the modifiers presented in this study.”
From Functional genomic screen and network analysis reveal novel modifiers of tauopathy dissociated from tau phosphorylation (2011) · cites this paper as [78]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Mutsuddi, M., Marshall, C. M., Benzow, K. A., Koob, M. D., & Rebay, I.
- Affiliations
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
- Williams College (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rebay, Ilaria
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 302-308
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026025236
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS042256, R01NS42256-02)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Keywords
- trinucleotide repeat expansion, neurodegeneration, Drosophila retina, Staufen, RNA-binding proteins, genetic modifier screen, CUG repeat expansion, RNA-protein interactions, split ends, neurodegenerative disease treatment
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Disease Models, Animal, DNA Mutational Analysis, Drosophila, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Gene Expression, RNA-Binding Proteins, Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate, Spinocerebellar Ataxias, RNA, Untranslated, Drosophila Proteins, RNA, Long Noncoding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review