Cited by 216Ion channel regulation and functionstochastic dynamics and bifurcationNeural dynamics and brain function

Ion-channel noise places limits on the miniaturization of the brain's wiring

Open access
Faisal, A. Aldo, White, John A., Laughlin, Simon B.·2005·Current Biology

Abstract

The action potential (AP) is transmitted by the concerted action of voltage-gated ion channels. Thermodynamic fluctuations in channel proteins produce probabilistic gating behavior, causing channel noise. Miniaturizing signaling systems increases susceptibility to noise, and with many cortical, cerebellar, and peripheral axons <0.5 mum diameter [1, 2 and 3], channel noise could be significant [4 and 5]. Using biophysical theory and stochastic simulations, we investigated channel-noise limits in unmyelinated axons. Axons of diameter below 0.1 microm become inoperable because single, spontaneously opening Na channels generate spontaneous AP at rates that disrupt communication. This limiting diameter is relatively insensitive to variations in biophysical parameters (e.g., channel properties and density, membrane conductance and leak) and will apply to most spiking axons. We demonstrate that the essential molecular machinery can, in theory, fit into 0.06 microm diameter axons. However, a comprehensive survey of anatomical data shows a lower limit for AP-conducting axons of 0.08-0.1 microm diameter. Thus, molecular fluctuations constrain the wiring density of brains. Fluctuations have implications for epilepsy and neuropathic pain because changes in channel kinetics or axonal properties can change the rate at which channel noise generates spontaneous activity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2005.05.056

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minimization of axon diameters leads to increased channel noise, setting a lower limit of about 0.1 μm diameter for action potential-conducting axons.

    “This minimization, however, leads to increased channel noise, setting a lower limit of about 0.1 µm diameter for action potential-conducting axons [19].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 216

Authors
Faisal, A. A., White, J. A., & Laughlin, S. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Faisal, A. Aldo
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
1143-1149
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024159878
Cited by
216
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
ion channel noise, voltage-gated sodium channels, axon diameter, unmyelinated axons, action potential propagation, spontaneous activity, thermal fluctuations, channel gating, epilepsy, neuropathic pain
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Biophysics, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Ion Channels, Mammals, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Stochastic Processes, Temperature, Biophysical Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review