Cited by 245Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer

Dorsoventral Axis Formation in the Drosophila Embryo—Shaping and Transducing a Morphogen Gradient

Open access
Moussian, Bernard, Roth, Siegfried·2005·Current Biology

Abstract

The graded nuclear location of the transcription factor Dorsal along the dorsoventral axis of the early Drosophila embryo provides positional information for the determination of different cell fates. Nuclear uptake of Dorsal depends on a complex signalling pathway comprising two parts: an extracellular proteolytic cascade transmits the dorsoventral polarity of the egg chamber to the early embryo and generates a gradient of active Spätzle protein, the ligand of the receptor Toll; an intracellular cascade downstream of Toll relays this graded signal to embryonic nuclei. The slope of the Dorsal gradient is not determined by diffusion of extracellular or intracellular components from a local source, but results from self-organised patterning, in which positive and negative feedback is essential to create and maintain the ratio of key factors at different levels, thereby establishing and stabilising the graded spatial information for Dorsal nuclear uptake.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.026

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the nuclei of early Drosophila embryos, the Dorsal transcription factor is present in a ventral-to-dorsal gradient.

    “Within the nuclei of early Drosophila embryos, the Dorsal transcription factor is present in a ventral-to-dorsal gradient”

    From Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo. (2009) · cites this paper as Moussian and Roth 2005

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 130 · Cited by 245

Authors
Moussian, B., & Roth, S.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology (DE)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
15
Issue
21
Pages
R887-R899
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082988779
Cited by
245
References
130
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 22
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
Keywords
dorsal-ventral axis, Drosophila embryo, morphogen gradients, Spätzle, Toll receptor, nuclear uptake, positive and negative feedback, cell fate determination
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Drosophila, Models, Biological, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphoproteins, Serine Endopeptidases, Transcription Factors, Signal Transduction, Cell Polarity, Body Patterning, Drosophila Proteins, Toll-Like Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review