Cited by 190Genetic diversity and population structureDiptera species taxonomy and behaviorInsect behavior and control techniques

Drosophila melanogaster's history as a human commensal

Open access
Keller, Andreas·2007·Current Biology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2006.12.031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keller, A.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Keller, Andreas
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
R77-R81
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088534000
Cited by
190
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DC005036)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Diptera species taxonomy and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect behavior and control techniques
Keywords
Drosophila melanogaster, historical biogeography, human-mediated dispersal, cosmopolitan distribution, population ecology, evolutionary history
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Europe, Biological Evolution, Genetics, Population, Humans, Human Activities, Male, Population Dynamics, Reproduction, United States, Ecosystem

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review