Cited by 244Action Observation and SynchronizationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesMotor Control and Adaptation

Somatic and motor components of action simulation

Open access
Avenanti, Alessio, Bolognini, Nadia, Maravita, Angelo, Aglioti, Salvatore Maria·2007·Current Biology

Abstract

Seminal studies in monkeys report that the viewing of actions performed by other individuals activates frontal and parietal cortical areas typically involved in action planning and execution. That mirroring actions might rely on both motor and somatosensory components is suggested by reports that action observation and execution increase neural activity in motor and in somatosensory areas. This occurs not only during observation of naturalistic movements but also during the viewing of biomechanically impossible movements that tap the afferent component of action, possibly by eliciting strong somatic feelings in the onlooker. Although somatosensory feedback is inherently linked to action execution, information on the possible causative role of frontal and parietal cortices in simulating motor and sensory action components is lacking. By combining low-frequency repetitive and single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation, we found that virtual lesions of ventral premotor cortex (vPMc) and primary somatosensory cortex (S1) suppressed mirror motor facilitation contingent upon observation of possible and impossible movements, respectively. In contrast, virtual lesions of primary motor cortex did not influence mirror motor facilitation. The reported double dissociation suggests that vPMc and S1 play an active, differential role in simulating efferent and afferent components of observed actions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.045

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ventral premotor and parietal regions homologous to macaque mirror neuron regions are causally involved in motor resonance.

    “Ventral premotor and parietal regions that are homologous to macaque regions containing mirror neurons have been shown to be causally involved in motor resonance (Avenanti et al., 2007; Koch et al., 2010).”

    From To imitate or not: Avoiding imitation involves preparatory inhibition of motor resonance (2014) · cites this paper as Avenanti et al., 2007

    The Summary (p. 1) and Discussion (p. 4) report that inhibiting ventral premotor cortex disrupted motor facilitation during observation of possible movements, while inhibiting primary somatosensory cortex (S1) disrupted it during observation of impossible movements. The paper therefore supports causal involvement of ventral premotor cortex and a parietal somatosensory area, but it does not establish that the parietal region tested is homologous to a macaque mirror-neuron region. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Facilitation of corticospinal excitability in muscles involved in an observed action (motor resonance) is a putative measure of mirror neuron system activity.

    “Facilitation of corticospinal excitability specifically in the muscles involved in performing an observed action (motor resonance) is a putative measure of MNS activity (Fadiga et al., 1995; Avenanti et al., 2007).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 244

Authors
Avenanti, A., Bolognini, N., Maravita, A., & Aglioti, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Fondazione Santa Lucia (IT)
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Avenanti, Alessio
  • Aglioti, Salvatore Maria
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
17
Issue
24
Pages
2129-2135
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001442225
Cited by
244
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 24
FWCI
20.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
action observation, action simulation, ventral premotor cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, primary motor cortex, virtual lesion, transcranial magnetic stimulation, mirror neuron system, frontal and parietal cortex
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Brain Mapping, Frontal Lobe, Hand, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Parietal Lobe, Visual Perception, Evoked Potentials, Motor, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review