Cited by 223Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

View-Based Encoding of Actions in Mirror Neurons of Area F5 in Macaque Premotor Cortex

Open access
Caggiano, Vittorio, Fogassi, Leonardo, Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Pomper, Joern K., Thier, Peter, Giese, Martin A., Casile, Antonino·2011·Current Biology

Abstract

Converging experimental evidence indicates that mirror neurons in the monkey premotor area F5 encode the goals of observed motor acts [1-3]. However, it is unknown whether they also contribute to encoding the perspective from which the motor acts of others are seen. In order to address this issue, we recorded the visual responses of mirror neurons of monkey area F5 by using a novel experimental paradigm based on the presentation of movies showing grasping motor acts from different visual perspectives. We found that the majority of the tested mirror neurons (74%) exhibited view-dependent activity with responses tuned to specific points of view. A minority of the tested mirror neurons (26%) exhibited view-independent responses. We conclude that view-independent mirror neurons encode action goals irrespective of the details of the observed motor acts, whereas the view-dependent ones might either form an intermediate step in the formation of view independence or contribute to a modulation of view-dependent representations in higher-level visual areas, potentially linking the goals of observed motor acts with their pictorial aspects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The single cell data suggest that relatively few mirror neurons have the field properties one would expect of a system designed by genetic evolution to represent high-level action intentions.

    “However, the single cell data again suggest that relatively few MNs have the field properties one would expect of a system designed by genetic evolution to represent high-level action intentions.”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Caggiano et al., 2011

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 223

Authors
Caggiano, V., Fogassi, L., Rizzolatti, G., Pomper, J. K., Thier, P., Giese, M. A., & Casile, A.
Affiliations
  • Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research (DE)
  • University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Giese, Martin A.
  • Casile, Antonino
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-01
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
144-148
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035306903
Cited by
223
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 16
FWCI
28.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
mirror neurons, action goals, perspective, grasping, visual perspective, macaque, action observation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Macaca, Motor Activity, Neurons, Video Recording, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review