Alternative sites of synaptic plasticity in two homologous “fan-out fan-in” learning and memory networks.
Open accessAbstract
Background To what extent are the properties of neuronal networks constrained by computational considerations? Comparative analysis of the vertical lobe (VL) system, a brain structure involved in learning and memory, in two phylogenetically close cephalopod mollusks, Octopus vulgaris and the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis, provides a surprising answer to this question.Results We show that in both the octopus and the cuttlefish the VL is characterized by the same simple fan-out fan-in connectivity architecture, composed of the same three neuron types. Yet, the sites of short- and long-term synaptic plasticity and neuromodulation are different. In the octopus, synaptic plasticity occurs at the fan-out glutamatergic synaptic layer, whereas in the cuttlefish plasticity is found at the fan-in cholinergic synaptic layer.Conclusions Does this dramatic difference in physiology imply a difference in function? Not necessarily. We show that the physiological properties of the VL neurons, particularly the linear input-output relations of the intermediate layer neurons, allow the two different networks to perform the same computation. The convergence of different networks to the same computational capacity indicates that it is the computation, not the specific properties of the network, that is self-organized or selected for by evolutionary pressure.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In cephalopod mollusks such as octopus and cuttlefish, the vertical lobe and superior frontal lobe form complex networks jointly analogous to the vertebrate hippocampus, and these integrating brain structures serve as basis for cephalopod learning and memory.
“In cephalopod mollusks such as octopus and cuttlefish, two brain structures, the vertical lobe and the superior frontal lobe, form complex networks that are jointly analogous to the vertebrate hippocampus. These integrating brain structures serve as the basis for cephalopod learning and memory (Shomrat et al., 2011; Hochner, 2013).”
From The Transition to Minimal Consciousness through the Evolution of Associative Learning (2016) · cites this paper as Shomrat et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 83
- Authors
- Shomrat, T., Graindorge, N., Bellanger, C., Fiorito, G., Loewenstein, Y., & Hochner, B.
- Affiliations
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
- Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Hochner, Binyamin
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 1773-1782
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139560011
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- synaptic plasticity, vertical lobe, Octopus vulgaris, Sepia officinalis, glutamatergic synapses, cholinergic synapses, neuromodulation, learning and memory, comparative neuroanatomy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Female, Ganglionic Blockers, Learning, Male, Memory, Synaptic Transmission, Neurons, Species Specificity, Long-Term Potentiation, Hexamethonium, Octopodiformes, Sepia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review