Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 428

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visual sensory networks and effective information transfer in animal groups

Open access
Strandburg-Peshkin, Ariana, Twomey, Colin R., Bode, Nikolai W.F., Kao, Albert B., Katz, Yael, Ioannou, Christos C., Rosenthal, Sara B., Torney, Colin J., Wu, Hai Shan, Levin, Simon A., Couzin, Iain D.·2013·Current Biology

Abstract

Social transmission of information is vital for many group-living animals, allowing coordination of motion and effective response to complex environments. Revealing the interaction networks underlying information flow within these groups is a central challenge. Previous work has modeled interactions between individuals based directly on their relative spatial positions: each individual is considered to interact with all neighbors within a fixed distance (metric range), a fixed number of nearest neighbors (topological range), a 'shell' of near neighbors (Voronoi range), or some combination (Figure 1A). However, conclusive evidence to support these assumptions is lacking. Here, we employ a novel approach that considers individual movement decisions to be based explicitly on the sensory information available to the organism. In other words, we consider that while spatial relations do inform interactions between individuals, they do so indirectly, through individuals' detection of sensory cues. We reconstruct computationally the visual field of each individual throughout experiments designed to investigate information propagation within fish schools (golden shiners, Notemigonus crysoleucas). Explicitly considering visual sensing allows us to more accurately predict the propagation of behavioral change in these groups during leadership events. Furthermore, we find that structural properties of visual interaction networks differ markedly from those of metric and topological counterparts, suggesting that previous assumptions may not appropriately reflect information flow in animal groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.059

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 428

Metadata

Authors
Strandburg-Peshkin, A., Twomey, C. R., Bode, N. W. F., Kao, A. B., Katz, Y., Ioannou, C. C., Rosenthal, S. B., Torney, C. J., Wu, H. S., Levin, S. A., & Couzin, I. D.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
23
Issue
17
Pages
R709-R711
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021532957
Cited by
428
References
19
FWCI
29.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual sensory networks and effective information transfer in animal groups. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.059
The paper
Strandburg-Peshkin, A., Twomey, C. R., Bode, N. W. F., Kao, A. B., Katz, Y., Ioannou, C. C., Rosenthal, S. B., Torney, C. J., Wu, H. S., Levin, S. A., & Couzin, I. D. (2013). Visual sensory networks and effective information transfer in animal groups. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.059

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.