Cited by 52Face Recognition and PerceptionAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

Robust orienting to protofacial stimuli in autism

Open access
Shah, Punit, Gaule, Anne, Bird, Geoffrey, Cook, Richard·2013·Current Biology

Abstract

Newborn infants exhibit a remarkable tendency to orient to faces. This behavior is thought to be mediated by a subcortical mechanism tuned to the protoface stimulus: a face-like configuration comprising three dark areas on a lighter background. When this unique stimulus translates across their visual field, neurotypical infants will change their gaze or head direction to track the protoface [1–3]. Orienting to this low spatial frequency pattern is thought to encourage infants to attend to faces, despite their poor visual acuity [2,3]. By biasing the input into the newborn's visual system, this primitive instinct may serve to ‘canalize' the development of more sophisticated face representation. Leading accounts attribute deficits of face perception associated with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) [4] to abnormalities within this orienting mechanism. If infants who are later diagnosed with ASD exhibit reduced protoface orienting, this may compromise the emergence of perceptual expertise for faces [5]. Here we report a novel effect that confirms that the protoface stimulus captures adults' attention via an involuntary, exogenous process (Experiment 1). Contrary to leading developmental accounts of face perception deficits in ASD, we go on to show that this orienting response is intact in autistic individuals (Experiment 2).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.034

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 52

Authors
Shah, P., Gaule, A., Bird, G., & Cook, R.
Affiliations
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Cook, Richard
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
23
Issue
24
Pages
R1087-R1088
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025941266
Cited by
52
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (WT102339MA)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
face perception, autism spectrum disorder, orienting, bottom-up attention, gaze direction, face attention, visual attention, face expertise
MeSH terms
Adult, Autistic Disorder, Face, Humans, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review