The Representation of Social Facial Touch in Rat Barrel Cortex
Open accessAbstract
Controlled presentation of stimuli to anesthetized [1] or awake [2] animals suggested that neurons in sensory cortices respond to elementary features [3, 4], but we know little about neuronal responses evoked by social interactions. Here we investigate processing in the barrel cortex of rats engaging in social facial touch [5, 6]. Sensory stimulation by conspecifics differs from classic whisker stimuli such as deflections, contact poles [7, 8], or textures [9, 10]. A large fraction of barrel cortex neurons responded to facial touch. Social touch responses peaked when animals aligned their faces and contacted each other by multiple whiskers with small, irregular whisker movements. Object touch was associated with larger, more regular whisker movements, and object responses were weaker than social responses. Whisker trimming abolished responses. During social touch, neurons in males increased their firing on average by 44%, while neurons in females increased their firing by only 19%. In females, socially evoked and ongoing firing rates were more than 1.5-fold higher in nonestrus than in estrus. Barrel cortex represented socially different contacts by distinct firing rates, and the variation of activity with sex and sexual status could contribute to the generation of gender-specific neural constructs of conspecifics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social touch, as opposed to non-social touch, results in stronger responses from cells within the rodent barrel cortex.
“Social touch, as opposed to non-social touch, results in stronger responses from cells within the rodent barrel cortex, a division of the primary somatosensory cortex corresponding to processing signals emerging from whiskers [94].”
From The Neurobiology of Love and Pair Bonding from Human and Animal Perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [94]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Bobrov, E., Wolfe, J., Rao, R. P., & Brecht, M.
- Affiliations
- Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Brecht, Michael
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-115
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073913808
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- barrel cortex, whisker movement, sex differences, estrous cycle, sexual status, social interaction, rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Male, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Touch, Vibrissae, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review