Cited by 128Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchOlfactory and Sensory Function StudiesGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

Sex, Age, and Hunger Regulate Behavioral Prioritization through Dynamic Modulation of Chemoreceptor Expression

Open access
Ryan, Deborah A., Miller, Renee M., Lee, KyungHwa, Neal, Scott J., Fagan, Kelli A., Sengupta, Piali, Portman, Douglas S.·2014·Current Biology

Abstract

Background Adaptive behavioral prioritization requires flexible outputs from fixed neural circuits. In C. elegans, the prioritization of feeding versus mate searching depends on biological sex (males will abandon food to search for mates, whereas hermaphrodites will not) as well as developmental stage and feeding status. Previously, we found that males are less attracted than hermaphrodites to the food-associated odorant diacetyl, suggesting that sensory modulation may contribute to behavioral prioritization.Results We show that somatic sex acts cell autonomously to reconfigure the olfactory circuit by regulating a key chemoreceptor, odr-10, in the AWA neurons. Moreover, we find that odr-10 has a significant role in food detection, the regulation of which contributes to sex differences in behavioral prioritization. Overexpression of odr-10 increases male food attraction and decreases off-food exploration; conversely, loss of odr-10 impairs food taxis in both sexes. In larvae, both sexes prioritize feeding over exploration; correspondingly, the sexes have equal odr-10 expression and food attraction. Food deprivation, which transiently favors feeding over exploration in adult males, increases male food attraction by activating odr-10 expression. Furthermore, the weak expression of odr-10 in well-fed adult males has important adaptive value, allowing males to efficiently locate mates in a patchy food environment.Conclusions We find that modulated expression of a single chemoreceptor plays a key role in naturally occurring variation in the prioritization of feeding and exploration. The convergence of three independent regulatory inputs--somatic sex, age, and feeding status--on chemoreceptor expression highlights sensory function as a key source of plasticity in neural circuits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.032

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several shared neurons, including sensory neurons, are sexually differentiated to support sex-specific navigational choices.

    “Several shared neurons, including sensory neurons, are sexually differentiated to support sex-specific navigational choices39,40.”

    From Whole-animal connectomes of both Caenorhabditis elegans sexes (2019) · cites this paper as [39]

    The section “Sexual Regulation of AWA and odr-10 Modulates Feeding Behavior” reports that changing the sexual state of the shared AWA sensory neurons alters food-leaving and food-search behavior in C. elegans. This supports a role for sexual differentiation in sex-specific choices, but the paper’s direct finding concerns one pair of sensory neurons, not several shared neurons. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 128

Authors
Ryan, D. A., Miller, R. M., Lee, K., Neal, S. J., Fagan, K. A., Sengupta, P., & Portman, D. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Portman, Douglas S.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
24
Issue
21
Pages
2509-2517
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054679205
Cited by
128
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (P40 OD010440, 0920024, 1256488)
  • Autism Speaks
  • Brandeis University
  • National Institutes of Health (OD010440, P40OD010440)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (PGSD‐3)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM108885, R01GM086456)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (T32ES007026)
  • Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, National Institutes of Health (P40OD010440, OD010440)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
sex differences, olfactory circuitry, food attraction, diacetyl, food deprivation, developmental stages, Caenorhabditis elegans, mate searching
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Chemoreceptor Cells, Female, Hunger, Male, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Caenorhabditis elegans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review