The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Screams Occupy a Privileged Niche in the Communication Soundscape
Open accessAbstract
Screaming is arguably one of the most relevant communication signals for survival in humans. Despite their practical relevance and their theoretical significance as innate [1] and virtually universal [2, 3] vocalizations, what makes screams a unique signal and how they are processed is not known. Here, we use acoustic analyses, psychophysical experiments, and neuroimaging to isolate those features that confer to screams their alarming nature, and we track their processing in the human brain. Using the modulation power spectrum (MPS, [4, 5]), a recently developed neurally-informed characterization of sounds, we demonstrate that human screams cluster within restricted portion of the acoustic space (between ∼30–150 Hz modulation rates) that corresponds to a well-known perceptual attribute, roughness. In contrast to the received view that roughness is irrelevant for communication [6], our data reveal that the acoustic space occupied by the rough vocal regime is segregated from other signals, including speech, a pre-requisite to avoid false-alarms in normal vocal communication. We show that roughness is present in natural alarm signals as well as in artificial alarms, and that the presence of roughness in sounds boosts their detection in various tasks. Using fMRI, we show that acoustic roughness engages subcortical structures critical to rapidly appraise danger. Altogether, these data demonstrate that screams occupy a privileged acoustic niche that, being separated from other communication signals, ensures their biological and ultimately social efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 · Cited by 8,496
Contributions of the Amygdala to Emotion Processing: From Animal Models to Human Behavior
Phelps, E. A., & LeDoux, J. E. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.09.025 · Cited by 3,203
Psychoacoustics: facts and models
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5706 · Cited by 2,402
Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations
Giraud, A.-L., & Poeppel, D. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3063 · Cited by 1,917
Self-citationVocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research.
Scherer, K. R. (1986) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.99.2.143 · Cited by 1,767
Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects
Rosen, S. (1992) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0070 · Cited by 1,130
?sparse? temporal sampling in auditory fMRI
Hall, D. A., Haggard, M. P., Akeroyd, M. A., Palmer, A. R., Summerfield, A. Q., Elliott, M. R., Gurney, E. M., & Bowtell, R. W. (1999) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1999)7:3<213::aid-hbm5>3.0.co;2-n · Cited by 869
The evolution of speech: a comparative review
Fitch, W. T. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01494-7 · Cited by 738
Pitch, consonance, and harmony
Terhardt, E. (1974) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1914648 · Cited by 701
Multiresolution spectrotemporal analysis of complex sounds
Chi, T., Ru, P., & Shamma, S. A. (2005) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1945807 · Cited by 673
Cited by
Williams, Z. J., He, J. L., Cascio, C. J., & Woynaroski, T. G. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.11.030 · Cited by 175
Biological principles for music and mental health
Bowling, D. L. (2023) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02671-4 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Arnal, L. H., Flinker, A., Kleinschmidt, A., Giraud, A.-L., & Poeppel, D.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 2051-2056
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1658162002
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 7.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human Screams Occupy a Privileged Niche in the Communication Soundscape. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.043
- The paper
- Arnal, L. H., Flinker, A., Kleinschmidt, A., Giraud, A.-L., & Poeppel, D. (2015). Human Screams Occupy a Privileged Niche in the Communication Soundscape. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.