The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bears Show a Physiological but Limited Behavioral Response to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Open accessAbstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have the potential to revolutionize the way research is conducted in many scientific fields. UAVs can access remote or difficult terrain, collect large amounts of data for lower cost than traditional aerial methods, and facilitate observations of species that are wary of human presence. Currently, despite large regulatory hurdles, UAVs are being deployed by researchers and conservationists to monitor threats to biodiversity, collect frequent aerial imagery, estimate population abundance, and deter poaching. Studies have examined the behavioral responses of wildlife to aircraft (including UAVs), but with the widespread increase in UAV flights, it is critical to understand whether UAVs act as stressors to wildlife and to quantify that impact. Biologger technology allows for the remote monitoring of stress responses in free-roaming individuals, and when linked to locational information, it can be used to determine events or components of an animal's environment that elicit a physiological response not apparent based on behavior alone. We assessed effects of UAV flights on movements and heart rate responses of free-roaming American black bears. We observed consistently strong physiological responses but infrequent behavioral changes. All bears, including an individual denned for hibernation, responded to UAV flights with elevated heart rates, rising as much as 123 beats per minute above the pre-flight baseline. It is important to consider the additional stress on wildlife from UAV flights when developing regulations and best scientific practices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gonzalez, L., Montes, G., Puig, E., Johnson, S., Mengersen, K., & Gaston, K. (2016) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s16010097 · Cited by 470
Unmanned aircraft systems as a new source of disturbance for wildlife: A systematic review
Mulero-Pázmány, M., Jenni-Eiermann, S., Strebel, N., Sattler, T., Negro, J. J., & Tablado, Z. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0178448 · Cited by 319
Fuller, A., Mitchell, D., Maloney, S. K., & Hetem, R. S. (2016) · Climate Change Responses · doi:10.1186/s40665-016-0024-1 · Cited by 207
Networked Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Surveillance and Monitoring: A Survey
Li, X., & Savkin, A. V. (2021) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi13070174 · Cited by 107
A global horizon scan of the future impacts of robotics and autonomous systems on urban ecosystems
Goddard, M. A., Davies, Z. G., Guenat, S., Ferguson, M. J., Fisher, J. C., Akanni, A., Ahjokoski, T., Anderson, P. M. L., Angeoletto, F., Antoniou, C., et al. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-020-01358-z · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Ditmer, M. A., Vincent, J. B., Werden, L. K., Tanner, J. C., Laske, T. G., Iaizzo, P. A., Garshelis, D. L., & Fieberg, J. R.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2278-2283
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1728600603
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bears Show a Physiological but Limited Behavioral Response to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.024
- The paper
- Ditmer, M. A., Vincent, J. B., Werden, L. K., Tanner, J. C., Laske, T. G., Iaizzo, P. A., Garshelis, D. L., & Fieberg, J. R. (2015). Bears Show a Physiological but Limited Behavioral Response to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.