Cited by 211Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFossil Insects in Amber

A Phylogenomic Solution to the Origin of Insects by Resolving Crustacean-Hexapod Relationships

Open access
Schwentner, Martin, Combosch, David J., Pakes Nelson, Joey, Giribet, Gonzalo·2017·Current Biology

Abstract

Insects, the most diverse group of organisms, are nested within crustaceans, arguably the most abundant group of marine animals. However, to date, no consensus has been reached as to which crustacean taxon is the closest relative of hexapods. A majority of studies have proposed that Branchiopoda (e.g., fairy shrimps) is the sister group of Hexapoda [1-7]. However, these investigations largely excluded two equally important taxa, Remipedia and Cephalocarida. Other studies suggested Remipedia [8-11] or Remipedia + Cephalocarida [12, 13] as potential sister groups of hexapods, but they either did not include Cephalocarida or used only Sanger sequence data and morphology [9, 12]. Here we present the first phylogenomic study specifically addressing the origins of hexapods, including transcriptomes for two species each of Cephalocarida and Remipedia. Phylogenetic analyses of selected matrices, ranging from 81 to 1,675 orthogroups and up to 510,982 amino acid positions, clearly reject a sister-group relationship between Hexapoda and Branchiopoda [1-7]. Nonetheless, support for a hexapod sister-group relationship to Remipedia or to Cephalocarida-Remipedia was highly dependent on the employed analytical methodology. Further analyses assessing the effects of gene evolutionary rate and targeted taxon exclusion support Remipedia as the sole sister taxon of Hexapoda and suggest that the prior grouping of Remipedia + Cephalocarida is an artifact, possibly due to long branch attraction and compositional heterogeneity. We further conclude that terrestrialization of Hexapoda probably occurred in the late Cambrian to early Ordovician, an estimate that is independent of their proposed sister group [4, 8, 12, 14].

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 211

Authors
Schwentner, M., Combosch, D. J., Pakes Nelson, J., & Giribet, G.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Schwentner, Martin
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
1818-1824.e5
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2622001059
Cited by
211
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 6
FWCI
9.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • German Science Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG SCHW 1810/1-1)
  • Fenner Chase Fund of the Museum of Comparative Zoology
  • National Geographic-Waitt Foundation (W313-14)
  • National Science Foundation (1402447)
  • Museum of Comparative Zoology
  • Faculty of Arts and Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
Keywords
insect origin, Hexapoda, crustacean phylogeny, Remipedia, Cephalocarida, Branchiopoda, sister group relationships, transcriptome, phylogenomics, long-branch attraction, compositional heterogeneity, land colonization, Cambrian-Ordovician
MeSH terms
Animals, Crustacea, Insecta, Phylogeny, Genome, Evolution, Molecular, Genome, Insect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review