Cited by 186Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Theta Oscillations in the Human Medial Temporal Lobe during Real-World Ambulatory Movement

Open access
M. Aghajan, Zahra, Schuette, Peter, Fields, Tony A., Tran, Michelle E., Siddiqui, Sameed M., Hasulak, Nicholas R., Tcheng, Thomas K., Eliashiv, Dawn +4 more·2017·Current Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The theta rhythm-a slow (6-12 Hz) oscillatory component of the local field potential-plays a critical role in spatial navigation and memory by coordinating the activity of neuronal ensembles within the medial temporal lobe (MTL). Although theta has been extensively studied in freely moving rodents, its presence in humans has been elusive and primarily investigated in stationary subjects. Here we used a unique clinical opportunity to examine theta within the human MTL during untethered, real-world ambulatory movement. We recorded intracranial electroencephalographic activity from participants chronically implanted with the wireless NeuroPace responsive neurostimulator (RNS) and tracked their motion with sub-millimeter precision. Our data revealed that movement-related theta oscillations indeed exist in humans, such that theta power is significantly higher during movement than immobility. Unlike in rodents, however, theta occurs in short bouts, with average durations of ∼400 ms, which are more prevalent during fast versus slow movements. In a rare opportunity to study a congenitally blind participant, we found that both the prevalence and duration of theta bouts were increased relative to the sighted participants. These results provide critical support for conserved neurobiological characteristics of theta oscillations during ambulatory spatial navigation, while highlighting some fundamental differences across species in these oscillations between humans and rodents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.062

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unlike during locomotion, theta oscillations during immobility occurred in short bouts, resembling oscillatory dynamics described in the human and bat hippocampus.

    “Unlike during locomotion, where theta oscillations are a prominent and steady rhythm, theta oscillations during immobility occurred in short bouts (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 4), thus resembling the oscillatory dynamics described in other species (e.g., in the human98 and bat hippocampus99).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 186

Authors
M. Aghajan, Z., Schuette, P., Fields, T. A., Tran, M. E., Siddiqui, S. M., Hasulak, N. R., Tcheng, T. K., Eliashiv, D., Mankin, E. A., Stern, J., Fried, I., & Suthana, N.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • NeuroPace (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Suthana, Nanthia
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
27
Issue
24
Pages
3743-3751.e3
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950653253
Cited by
186
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 1
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UCLA
  • DARPA (N66001-14-2-4029)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS058280, NS084017)
  • A.P. Giannini Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
theta oscillations, medial temporal lobe, local field potentials, spatial navigation, memory, congenital blindness, human-rodent comparison, intracranial EEG
MeSH terms
Electrocorticography, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Temporal Lobe, Theta Rhythm, Walking, Implantable Neurostimulators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review