The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unravelling the Molecular Determinants of Bee Sensitivity to Neonicotinoid Insecticides
Open accessAbstract
The impact of neonicotinoid insecticides on the health of bee pollinators is a topic of intensive research and considerable current debate [1]. As insecticides, certain neonicotinoids, i.e., N-nitroguanidine compounds such as imidacloprid and thiamethoxam, are as intrinsically toxic to bees as to the insect pests they target. However, this is not the case for all neonicotinoids, with honeybees orders of magnitude less sensitive to N-cyanoamidine compounds such as thiacloprid [2]. Although previous work has suggested that this is due to rapid metabolism of these compounds [2-5], the specific gene(s) or enzyme(s) involved remain unknown. Here, we show that the sensitivity of the two most economically important bee species to neonicotinoids is determined by cytochrome P450s of the CYP9Q subfamily. Radioligand binding and inhibitor assays showed that variation in honeybee sensitivity to N-nitroguanidine and N-cyanoamidine neonicotinoids does not reside in differences in their affinity for the receptor but rather in divergent metabolism by P450s. Functional expression of the entire CYP3 clade of P450s from honeybees identified a single P450, CYP9Q3, that metabolizes thiacloprid with high efficiency but has little activity against imidacloprid. We demonstrate that bumble bees also exhibit profound differences in their sensitivity to different neonicotinoids, and we identify CYP9Q4 as a functional ortholog of honeybee CYP9Q3 and a key metabolic determinant of neonicotinoid sensitivity in this species. Our results demonstrate that bee pollinators are equipped with biochemical defense systems that define their sensitivity to insecticides and this knowledge can be leveraged to safeguard bee health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zanger, U. M., & Schwab, M. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007 · Cited by 4,169
Riveron, J. M., Irving, H., Ndula, M., Barnes, K. G., Ibrahim, S. S., Paine, M. J. I., & Wondji, C. S. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1216705110 · Cited by 242
Cited by
The Role of Cytochrome P450s in Insect Toxicology and Resistance
Nauen, R., Bass, C., Feyereisen, R., & Vontas, J. (2022) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-070621-061328 · Cited by 508
Self-citationGlobal Trends in Bumble Bee Health
Cameron, S. A., & Sadd, B. M. (2020) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-011118-111847 · Cited by 367
Glyphosate impairs collective thermoregulation in bumblebees
Weidenmüller, A., Meltzer, A., Neupert, S., Schwarz, A., & Kleineidam, C. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf7482 · Cited by 109
The Birth-and-Death Evolution of Cytochrome P450 Genes in Bees
Darragh, K., Nelson, D. R., & Ramírez, S. R. (2021) · Genome Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/gbe/evab261 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Manjon, C., Troczka, B. J., Zaworra, M., Beadle, K., Randall, E., Hertlein, G., Singh, K. S., Zimmer, C. T., Homem, R. A., Lueke, B., Reid, R., Kor, L., Kohler, M., Benting, J., Williamson, M. S., Davies, T. G. E., Field, L. M., Bass, C., & Nauen, R.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1137-1143.e5
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792891998
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unravelling the Molecular Determinants of Bee Sensitivity to Neonicotinoid Insecticides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.045
- The paper
- Manjon, C., Troczka, B. J., Zaworra, M., Beadle, K., Randall, E., Hertlein, G., Singh, K. S., Zimmer, C. T., Homem, R. A., Lueke, B., Reid, R., Kor, L., Kohler, M., Benting, J., Williamson, M. S., Davies, T. G. E., Field, L. M., Bass, C., & Nauen, R. (2018). Unravelling the Molecular Determinants of Bee Sensitivity to Neonicotinoid Insecticides. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.