A New Unifying Account of the Roles of Neuronal Entrainment
Open accessAbstract
Rhythms are a fundamental and defining feature of neuronal activity in animals including humans. This rhythmic brain activity interacts in complex ways with rhythms in the internal and external environment through the phenomenon of 'neuronal entrainment', which is attracting increasing attention due to its suggested role in a multitude of sensory and cognitive processes. Some senses, such as touch and vision, sample the environment rhythmically, while others, like audition, are faced with mostly rhythmic inputs. Entrainment couples rhythmic brain activity to external and internal rhythmic events, serving fine-grained routing and modulation of external and internal signals across multiple spatial and temporal hierarchies. This interaction between a brain and its environment can be experimentally investigated and even modified by rhythmic sensory stimuli or invasive and non-invasive neuromodulation techniques. We provide a comprehensive overview of the topic and propose a theoretical framework of how neuronal entrainment dynamically structures information from incoming neuronal, bodily and environmental sources. We discuss the different types of neuronal entrainment, the conceptual advances in the field, and converging evidence for general principles.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Because rhythms are predictable, bodily-entrained neural oscillations could help align phases optimal for sensory processing with the expected timing of stimulus inputs.
“Because rhythms are predictable, bodily-entrained neural oscillations 204 could help align phases optimal for sensory processing with the expected timing of stimulus inputs.”
From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [204]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 234 · Cited by 508
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [98]Cao L, Thut G, and Gross J (2016). The role of brain oscillations in predicting the sensory consequences of your actions. BioRxiv.
- Authors
- Lakatos, P., Gross, J., & Thut, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Münster (DE)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gross, Joachim
- Thut, Gregor
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- R890-R905
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6769420
- OpenAlex
- W2975966138
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 234
- Citations by year
- 2026: 66 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Keywords
- neural entrainment, neural oscillations, auditory rhythm, neuromodulation, information routing, brain-environment interaction
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Attention, Auditory Perception, Biological Clocks, Brain, Environment, Humans, Neurons, Periodicity, Somatosensory Cortex, Touch Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review