The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attachment bonds between domestic cats and humans
Abstract
Worldwide, domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus) outnumber domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Despite cats' success in human environments, dog social cognition has received considerably more scientific attention over the last several decades [1-3]. A key aspect of what has been said to make dogs unique is their proclivity for forming attachment bonds, including secure attachments to humans [1,3], which could provide scaffolding for the development of human-like socio-cognitive abilities and contribute to success in human environments [3]. Cats, like dogs, can be found living in social groups or solitarily, depending on early developmental factors, resource distribution, and lifetime experiences such as human interaction [1,2,4]. Despite fewer studies, research suggests we may be underestimating cats' socio-cognitive abilities [2]. Here we report evidence, using behavioral criteria established in the human infant literature [5,6], that cats display distinct attachment styles toward human caregivers. Evidence that cats share social traits once attributed to dogs and humans alone would suggest that broader non-canine-specific mechanisms may be needed to explain cross-species attachment and socio-cognitive abilities.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“both dogs and cats form infant-like attachment bonds with humans, who are for them a source of protection and reassurance [24,186,188,189].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [189]
Citations
Cites
Harlow, H. F. (1958) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0047884 · Cited by 2,022 · cited 1×
“In our study, cats and owners participated in a Secure Base Test (SBT), an abbreviated strange situation test used to evaluate attachment security in primates [7] and dogs [8].”
MethodAinsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1127388 · Cited by 1,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Udell, 2016, Are dogs social generalists? Canine social cognition, attachment, and the dog-human bond, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 25, 327, 10.1177/0963721416662647 · DOI
- Vitale Shreve, 2015, What’s inside your cat’s head? A review of cat (Felis silvestris catus) cognition research past, present and future, Anim. Cogn., 18, 1195, 10.1007/s10071-015-0897-6 · DOI
- Topál, 2005, Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies, Anim. Behav., 70, 1367, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.03.025 · DOI
- Izawa, 1993, Flexibility of the social system of the feral cat, Felis catus, Physiol. Ecol. Jpn., 29, 237
- Wanser, 2018, Does attachment security to a human handler influence the behavior of dogs who engage in animal assisted activities?, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 210, 88, 10.1016/j.applanim.2018.09.005 · DOI · Paper page
- Schöberl, 2016, Social factors influencing cortisol modulation in dogs during a strange situation procedure, J. Vet. Behav., 11, 77, 10.1016/j.jveb.2015.09.007 · DOI
- Colin, 1991, Infant Attachment: What We Know Now. U.S, Department of Health and Human Services Report
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Vitale, K. R., Behnke, A. C., & Udell, M. A. R.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- R864-R865
- ISSN
- 0960-9822
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1314109-DGE)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review