Cited by 25Paleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFossil Insects in Amber

Growth and miniaturization among alvarezsauroid dinosaurs

Open access
Qin, Zichuan, Zhao, Qi, Choiniere, Jonah N., Clark, James M., Benton, Michael J., Xu, Xing·2021·Current Biology

Abstract

Sustained miniaturization, here defined as a drop in body size of at least two orders of magnitude from ancestors to descendants, is a widespread and important phenomenon in animals,1-3 but among dinosaurs, miniaturization occurred only rarely, once in the lineage leading to birds and once in the Alvarezsauroidea,1,3-5 one of the most bizarre theropod groups.1,5-7 Miniaturization and powered flight are intimately linked in avialan theropods,3,5,6,8-11 but the causes and patterns of body size reduction are less clear in the non-volant Alvarezsauroidea.1,5,6,12,13 Here, we present results from analyses on a comprehensive dataset, which not only includes new data from early-branching alvarezsauroids but also considers the ontogenetic effect based on histological data. Our analyses show that alvarezsauroid body mass underwent rapid miniaturization from around 110 to 85 mya and that there was a phylogenetic radiation of small-sized alvarezsauroids in the Late Cretaceous. Our analyses also indicate that growth strategies were highly variable among alvarezsauroids, with significant differences among extremely small taxa. The suggested alvarezsauroid miniaturization and associated phylogenetic radiation are coincident with the emergence of ants and termites, and combining previous functional morphological data, our study suggests that alvarezsauroid miniaturization might have been driven by ecological changes during the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution, more specifically by a shift to the myrmecophagous ecological niche.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.013

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The teeth of Archaeopteryx lack serrations, as in anchiornithines, some troodontids (e.g., Byronosaurus) and other Mesozoic birds.

    “As in anchiornithines, some troodontids (e.g., Byronosaurus ) and other Mesozoic birds, the teeth lack serrations [81-83] (Fig.3).”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [81]

  • The number of teeth is reduced from 14 maxillary and 16 dentary teeth in Anchiornis to 8-10 maxillary and 11-13 dentary teeth in Archaeopteryx.

    “The number of teeth is reduced from 14 maxillary and 16 dentary teeth in Anchiornis , a taxon documented to be at least partially vertivorous [84], to 8-10 maxillary and 11-13 dentary teeth in Archaeopteryx [13, 81].”

    From The ecology of Archaeopteryx (2026) · cites this paper as [81]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qin, Z., Zhao, Q., Choiniere, J. N., Clark, J. M., Benton, M. J., & Xu, X.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Xu, Xing
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
31
Issue
16
Pages
3687-3693.e5
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3178159540
Cited by
25
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-08-23)
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council
  • Royal Society (NA160290, 42072008)
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41688103, 41120124002)
  • National Science Foundation (EAR 0310217)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (AOP 98800, IRG 95449, AOP 118794)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fossil Insects in Amber
Keywords
body size reduction, ontogeny, histology, Late Cretaceous, myrmecophagy, ecological niche shift, body mass
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Phylogeny, Dinosaurs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review