Competition for microtubule lattice spacing between a microtubule expander and compactor
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Microtubules exist in expanded and compacted states, as defined by the lattice spacing of αβ-tubulin dimers. Changes in lattice spacing have been linked to factors such as GTP-hydrolysis, the binding of microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs), the tubulin code, and microtubule bending. These diverse factors exert opposing molecular driving forces on the microtubule lattice that push lattice spacing toward expanded or compacted states. To better understand how these opposing forces are reconciled, we developed in vitro and cell-based model systems for the competition between a microtubule expander (paclitaxel) and a microtubule compactor (doublecortin or DCX). Using an in vitro reconstitution approach, we show that paclitaxel expands microtubules cooperatively. In cells, high concentrations of paclitaxel cause DCX to relocalize to compacted lattices found at concave bends. When the concentration of DCX is increased, however, we find that DCX re-compacts the previously expanded microtubules in vitro. Consistently, high expression levels of DCX prevent its relocalization in paclitaxel-treated cells. When the competition between paclitaxel and DCX is "balanced," we observe a complex phenotype: DCX simultaneously localizes to both long, straight clusters and concave bends, whereas other regions on the microtubule network remain DCX free. We conclude that multiple lattice spacings can coexist in cells. Our results indicate that competition for microtubule lattice spacing is a critical aspect of microtubule physiology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diversity of microtubule conformations includes differences in protofilament number, longitudinal compaction or expansion, and dimer twist.
“Diversity of microtubule conformations includes differences in protofilament number, longitudinal compaction or expansion, and dimer twist 63,66,71,72 (Extended Data Fig. 6c).”
From Taxane-induced conformational changes in the microtubule lattice activate GEF-H1-dependent RhoA signalling (2026) · cites this paper as [71]
The Abstract states that microtubules have expanded and compacted states defined by αβ-tubulin dimer lattice spacing. The passages from our copy do not address variation in protofilament number or dimer twist (searched both terms), so they support only the longitudinal-spacing part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPTXL expands the microtubule lattice while doublecortin triggers microtubule compaction.
“The other identifies differences between the mechanism of action of PTXL (which expands the lattice, as reported above) and doublecortin, a protein that triggers microtubule compaction [58].”
PTXL binding likely allosterically remodels the tubulin interdimer interface, resulting in longitudinal MT expansion.
“It is likely that PTXL binding to the MT allosterically remodels the tubulin interdimer interface [57], resulting in longitudinal MT expansion [58].”
Such regional variation is consistent with previous studies and suggests that lattice conformation can be locally influenced by lattice-binding microtubule-associated proteins, post-translational modifications, mechanical stress, or repair processes.
“Such regional variation is consistent with previous studies58and suggest that lattice conformation can be locally influenced by lattice-binding microtuble-associated proteins (MAPs)59–61, post-translational modifications, mechanical stress50,51, or repair processes62–66.”
From Ghost Neuron preparation unlocks high-resolution structural mapping of intracellular architecture in axons (2026) · cites this paper as [58]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Paquette, A. L., Tetlalmatzi, S. C., Haineault, J. A. G., Li, Y., Finkel, N., Hendricks, A. G., Brouhard, G. J., & Sébastien, M.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Brouhard, Gary J.
- Sébastien, Muriel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 4442-4452.e4
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4413812504
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 8.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-185997, PJT-148702)
- McGill University
- Fonds de recherche du Québec
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2020-04876)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
- Keywords
- paclitaxel, doublecortin, microtubule-associated proteins, microtubule bending, microtubule dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Doublecortin Domain Proteins, Doublecortin Protein, Animals, Humans, Microtubule Proteins, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Neuropeptides, Tubulin, Paclitaxel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review