Cited by 0Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsEnvironmental and biological studiesIsotope Analysis in Ecology

Soil invertebrates facilitate plant nitrogen assimilation in a tropical seasonal secondary forest

Open access
Zeng, Xiaoyi, Wong, Annabella C., Boyle, Michael J.W., Cybulski, Jonathan D., Majcher, Bartosz M., Güçlü, Coskun, Kong, Xiangshi, Bonebrake, Timothy C. +4 more·2026·Current Biology

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is an essential nutrient for plant growth, and its availability frequently constrains primary productivity during forest recovery 1. Soil invertebrates play a crucial role in N mineralization during litter decomposition 2; however, whether they regulate downstream plant N assimilation remains unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we carried out a 15-month invertebrate exclusion experiment in a tropical seasonal secondary forest, using N-stable-isotope (15 N) tracers to track N transfer from 15 N-labeled-leaf litter to plant leaves in the presence or absence of soil invertebrates. We found invertebrates increased 15 N atom excess in plant leaves by 59.4% by enhancing 15 N release from 15 N-labeled-leaf litter by 6.3%. This study provides direct evidence that soil invertebrates represent an underappreciated pathway linking biodiversity, primary productivity, and nutrient cycling. As active regulators of plant nutrition and N turnover, soil invertebrates are crucial for plant growth and carbon sequestration 1, especially in secondary forests that are increasingly becoming the predominant forest type in tropical regions 3.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2026.03.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10

Authors
Zeng, X., Wong, A. C., Boyle, M. J. W., Cybulski, J. D., Majcher, B. M., Güçlü, C., Kong, X., Bonebrake, T. C., Eggleton, P., Baker, D. M., Griffiths, H. M., & Ashton, L. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Jishou University (CN)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Ashton, Louise A.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-05
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
R375-R376
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7160300047
Cited by
0
References
10
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (AR 215206)
  • University of Hong Kong
  • University Grants Committee (17105624)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and biological studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Keywords
soil invertebrates, plant nitrogen assimilation, nitrogen mineralization, leaf litter decomposition, 15N tracer, secondary forest, tropical seasonal forest, nutrient cycling, carbon sequestration
MeSH terms
Animals, Invertebrates, Nitrogen, Nitrogen Isotopes, Seasons, Soil, Trees, Tropical Climate, Plant Leaves, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review