Cited by 3Genetic diversity and population structureMarine and fisheries researchGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

Adaptive genomic divergence parallels migratory behavior in Atlantic bluefin tuna

Open access
Mikles, Chloe S., Pagniello, Camille M.L.S., Bigal, Eyal, Moran, Benjamin M., Rooker, Jay R., Ortega, Aurelio, de la Gándara, Fernando, Maxwell, Hugo +5 more·2026·Current Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Identifying and preserving biological diversity is fundamental for the conservation of wild populations. The Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus, ABT) is an apex predator and vital species to the pelagic ecosystems of the North Atlantic Ocean, with populations now rebounding from decades of overfishing due to strict enforcement of conservation measures. Here, we combine high-resolution whole-genome sequencing data with spatial data from electronic tagging to improve our understanding of population structure in ABT. We analyzed 82 whole-genome sequences obtained from mature fish tracked to geographically distinct spawning grounds, as well as larvae representing the two recognized stocks (western and eastern) of ABT. We obtained 11,181,223 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and integrated these genomic data with 12,974 total geolocation days of adult ABT (mean individual deployment length: 271 ± 110.4 days). This extensive dataset of electronic tracks enables spatial assignment of individuals to their respective spawning grounds and the first whole-genome comparison of migratory phenotypes. Both neutral and adaptive SNP markers reflect the same genomic population structure as the spatial movement patterns, likely maintained by natal philopatry, and we highlight candidate genes with potentially adaptive roles. Our analyses show that the two populations diverged ∼27,000 years ago, overlapping with the Last Glacial Maximum, and we suggest that oceanographic variation of the spawning grounds has contributed to shaping present-day bluefin tuna genomic diversity. Overall, these results improve our understanding of adaptive variation in bluefin tuna, which will be important for management decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2026.04.006

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Mikles, C. S., Pagniello, C. M. L. S., Bigal, E., Moran, B. M., Rooker, J. R., Ortega, A., de la Gándara, F., Maxwell, H., Schallert, R., Castleton, M. R., Schumer, M., Stokesbury, M. J. W., & Block, B. A.
Affiliations
  • Hopkins Marine Station (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Texas A&M University at Galveston (US)
  • Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES)
  • Marine Institute (IE)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Acadia University (CA)
Corresponding author
Mikles, Chloe S.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-05
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
2518-2536.e4
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7158464965
Cited by
3
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
9.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NOAA Fisheries
  • Stanford University
  • Ocean Foundation
  • National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
Thunnus thynnus, migratory behavior, population structure, natal philopatry, spawning grounds, electronic monitoring, single nucleotide polymorphisms, candidate genes, Last Glacial Maximum, population divergence, fish conservation
MeSH terms
Animals, Atlantic Ocean, Tuna, Genome, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Animal Migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review